View Single Post
Old 10-28-2010 | 01:26 PM
  #1783  
freightguy
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
I think this is the key. They are doing this for the regionals because that is who they represent.
Absolutely capncrunch. ALPA has been rolling around this 1500hr issue for a while. ALPA reps have given me all kinds of BS excuses which they got from the national...none of which makes any sense.

First it was: We are supporting the reduction of the 1500hr requirement as a bargaining chip against Emirates getting more landing slots in the US.

Now: Poor airline managements won't be able to find qualified pilots if we up the requirement to 1500hrs! Barriers to entry for all the glossy eyed SJS kids will be too high!! (Somehow this is our problem now?)

None of this makes any f'n sense. Capncrunch is right on. This is a game by ALPA national to appease the regional airline industry. And the game is played with our dues checks. If you have any doubts, please re-read this again.

October 13, 2010

Committee Challenges New 1500 Hr Requirement For FO's

By Glenn Pew, Contributing Editor, Video Editor


The FAA's aviation safety bill passed earlier this year, but a new report suggests the included prerequisite 1,500 hours flight experience for commercial airline copilots may not be necessary. An FAA advisory committee led by a regional airline official has proposed that 500 actual flight hours may be enough. Language in the safety legislation says that the FAA Administrator "may allow specific academic training courses ... to be credited toward the total flight hours required." The committee suggests that through an elaborate structure of training courses, up to two-thirds of the safety law's required 1,500 flight hours could be satisfied with other credited training. The proposal is merely a recommendation and it is not clear that there is any wiggle room in other language that specifically imposes the flight hours requirement. Meanwhile, the proposal has reignited the total hours versus quality-of-training argument. And pilot groups, industry voices and safety advocates are weighing in.

Legislators who fought for the safety bill's language say the law explicitly requires 1,500 flight hours, and any modifications must be justified by a resultant increase in safety. The president of the Regional Airline Association, Roger Cohen, has a different opinion. Cohen said academic work is "far more useful in training pilots for modern airline operations" than hours spent "towing banners above the beach." As for the FAA, Administrator Randy Babbitt supports improved training over a general requirement for more flight hours. Babbitt has previously commented on the subject, saying "experience is not measured by flight time alone." The Regional Airline Association holds the view that a "proper mix of the experience and academic/training approaches" would best ensure safety. And two pilot groups represented on the committee have split on the issue. The Air Line Pilots Association backed the committee's recommendations, while the Coalition of Air Line Pilot Associations supported experience over even enhanced training.
Reply