View Single Post
Old 10-30-2010 | 07:59 AM
  #32  
krudawg
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain, retired
Default

Originally Posted by JetDaily
Yes, United was big in 2001, but not this big. United did NOT have near this many planes, pilots, FAs or other employee groups. Sorry, the numbers just don't bear that out. I believe the number of pilots only reached as high as 11,000 and the number of planes about 650, or so, back in 2000/01. United now has over 12,500 pilots and about 700 mainline airframes.

Skippy is EXACTLY right. United Pilots will NEVER be allowed to strike for two reasons. First, it is almost inconceiveable that the United MEC would be released from mediation by NMB to begin a cooling off period after having broken the law so blatantly by their actions in 2007/08 and their subsequent preliminary injunction handed down by Judge Lefkow (and STONGLY upheld by the appelate court judge). Yes, that injunction is STILL in full force and effect indefinitely.

Second, the PEB that would be convened (regardless of which party was occupying the Oval Office) would instruct the parties to "return to the table" until an agreement had been reached. No sitting president would, in his/her right mind, allow an airline the size of the new United to stop flying, especially in light of the volatile nature and fragility of today's economy.

It's just not going to happen, IMHO.

JD
Are you kidding me. President Obama is "beholding" to unions. He will follow the advice of OUR collective MEC's and look the other way if a strike is authorized - Don't kid yourselves; Save your money and be prepared; a strike is VERY possible and perhaps needed as the only way to let management know that it's time to send Glen's "employee enslavement theorys" to the trash heap of failed idea's.
Reply