Originally Posted by
DAL 88 Driver
For me personally, this MEC better elect a Chairman that is vastly different from LM and that understands the importance of setting and communicating restoration as our objective. If they don't, my total support will be for DPA because DALPA will have conclusively proven to me that it is not capable of the necessary changes.
How many times are we going to each repeat ourselves, 88? APA touted the "restoration" for 3+ years, and that strategy yielded zip. Why do you think us touting that would have any different result?
I want an MEC to develop a strategy to maximize what we are able to achieve. If that is C2K+, excellent; if its not, then so be it, so long as its the best we could get. And yelling ANY arbitrary number is meaningless. It's all about leverage and unity; something that will sorely be lacking if the DPA drive keeps going.