View Single Post
Old 12-07-2006 | 02:19 PM
  #31  
rickair7777's Avatar
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,632
Likes: 562
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
You people don't realize that the % of planes that we are "losing" even though we arent losing any of them, they are just not going to be flown for CAL, does not reflect the % of reduced flying, so for example if they withdrew 25% of the planes everybody thinks that xjt is going to do 25% less flying for CAL, not the case just less airplanes, and each aircraft will be flwn more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don't fly off the handle...this is not an emotional argument. I was addressing someone who was CONSIDERING xjet, not someone who currently works there. You are already along for the ride, and can't do much about it, but let's be honest...

69-11 = 58 airplanes x 5 crews = 580 pilots...that's a lot of people, and a modest increase in CAL block hours for the remaining airplanes will not account for that many. Maybe you haven't been in this business long enough to understand the rumor mill, but it I can guarantee you that any speculation that's not in an official company press release is just science fiction.

Any way you slice it this is not good news...until another codeshare is officially announced.
Reply