Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
And you guys like to discredit the little notion of supply side economics. Squeezing the supply side so much that the vendors start looking elsewhere is a very real problem. See most of US industry and the wages we have. We have priced ourselves out of producing almost anything in this country. These responses do not effect the power players and only effect the middle class, so there is no down side to it for them, only you and I.
Oh yeah, we created laws and taxes to stop that, they seemed to have worked real well. People will create corporations outside of US jurisdiction to compete against the higher cost, where unions are illegal.
Do not think it will happen here? The power people control the majority of the legislative people, and when the costs get to high, they will lean on them to allow 50%+ foreign ownership, or do away with the requirement all together, then they will get rid of cabatoage. That will result in these alliances becoming airlines with ata codes and us becoming contractors in a portfolio where pilots from airlines and countries pay pennies on the dollar to our wages. Think of how much you will have to give up in contractual gains to stop this?
Carl and 88 will call it fear, but the simple fact is that it is real world capitalism. In this day and age there is no stopping it. They will continue to argue that it will happen anyway, and they are probably correct, but how we deal with our supply side issue in this country will dictate the severity of the response by the power and money players.
--------------
Get scope reeled in and the supply problem falls in line.
We in the US are not likely to allow cabotage. The CRAF is too important to our strategic requirements. I doubt it would go over well if we had to rely on a Ukrainian or Emirati corporation to provide our military's forward deployment.
With the recent devaluation of the dollar, I disagree that we have priced ourselves out of producing anything.