View Single Post
Old 11-10-2010 | 02:43 PM
  #15  
SoCalGuy's Avatar
SoCalGuy
Keep Calm Chive ON
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,086
Likes: 0
From: Boeing's Plastic Jet Button Pusher - 787
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Yes you're all correct, its all the CAL MEC's fault. Talk about deflection. Lets try this again:

The joint NC came up with a pay proposal that was agreed to by CAL's MEC and denied by UAL's. That much is fact.

Now we have guys telling us, with absolutely no proof other than a miscellaneous UAL rep said so, that the CAL MEC wants to use the pay banding in the SLI.

Didn't Jay emphatically state that pay should not be used as an issue for the SLI? Oh yeah, as my buddy Coto says, don't let facts get in the way.

Nice try though, again.

+1
That all seems pretty clear as far as what 'our reps' have shared with us.

To me, the opening post reminds me of "A Blind Man picking out his favorite Porno......Reaching for absolutely anything".

I will agree....There has been much posturing and BS through this entire Merger thus far, but to have CAL's MEC shoulder the blame as being the solo "Poor Form" here??? The most pathetic excuse I've heard yet.

I know one thing, I for one WILL NOT rush/cave on any JCBA to 'just have one'. Both pilot groups will live under their respective CBA till the JCBA is done. If that's the case, I am damn will willing to do so till we get something to be that our MEC/NC feels worthy for it's pilot group to vote.
Reply