Originally Posted by
757Driver
Yes you're all correct, its all the CAL MEC's fault. Talk about deflection. Lets try this again:
The joint NC came up with a pay proposal that was agreed to by CAL's MEC and denied by UAL's. That much is fact.
Now we have guys telling us, with absolutely no proof other than a miscellaneous UAL rep said so, that the CAL MEC wants to use the pay banding in the SLI.
Didn't Jay emphatically state that pay should not be used as an issue for the SLI? Oh yeah, as my buddy Coto says, don't let facts get in the way.
Nice try though, again.
Let's see if this is "emphatically" stated......and yes, I quote....
>>>>>It is very clear that the problem is not with the CAL MEC or the JNC. The problem rests solely with the UAL MEC and their insistence that the compensation proposal enhance their SLI argument.
To further complicate matters, the UAL MEC has proposed a resolution to the ALPA Executive Council suggesting that the Council mandate that the JCBA cannot be used in the SLI arbitration. In essence, the UAL MEC wants to restrict the arbitration panel from hearing the whole truth. They want to carve out parts we believe would be necessary for the arbitrators to understand both pilot groups’ full stories. We will, of course, fight for the truth to be told in its unvarnished entirety.
<<<<<<<<<<
AM I THE ONLY ONE IN THE WORLD THAT SEES THE END OF PARAGRAPH ONE AND PARAGRAPH TWO TO BE IN COMPLETE CONFLICT WITH EACH OTHER???