Originally Posted by
757Driver
If what your saying is true, why did the JCBA bargaining teams from both UAL and CAL AND our MEC agree to a pay proposal while UAL's MEC did not?
Nice try though.
That's what you have to refute my original post?
OK. Uh. Let's see.......
Because the UAL MEC saw what was going on and said "No 'flipping' way"? Could that be the answer?
You do not refute any of the points, but you say "But.....But......the negotiating committee agreed to it!!!!!!" So what!?
I fully support my MEC in their absolute opposition to this banding issue if it's going to be used to try and improve CAL's SLI argument. "Well sir, you can see our 767-400 is paid as much as UAL's 777s and 747s. Oh, and as you can see here, our 737-900 and -800 is paid well above what UAL pays their Airbus aircraft."
GMAFB.
Get the best contract you can!!!! Pay the forking 767-400 and 737-900 the moon!!!!!! I DON'T CARE!!!!!
BUT, you use those newly negotiated pay rates to fork me out of seniority??????
Nice tie, as we like to say on the UAL MEC forum.