View Single Post
Old 11-23-2010 | 09:08 AM
  #2881  
TheManager's Avatar
TheManager
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
I am all for using as many airlines as possible to use as comparisons as possible. I get where you are going with this, and there would need to be a composite rate for the 765, and the variants of the 320, 73N and 320 as well.

If we look at Skyteam, there are probably a few carriers that go above and below our pay. Same for the other alliances. We would also have to equalize the currency, and tax rates for individuals and corporations in each country as well. It would be a complex process, but I am all for it if it leads to a better return.

SWA is efficient, but as they grow and with hew rest rules that may change to a degree. I like where you are heading, it makes sense on some level, and takes the tired and true formula used for a long time and simplifies it. I am sure there are positives and negatives to it, but it is something I would have no issue looking at and if deemed a strategy that would prove successful, we should employ it. Not going to argue on that.
Acl, I have tried and tried on the net to access pay info on our Sky Team bros. No luck. Do any of you have accurate info on compensation at AF/KLM?

Is this resolution worthy? A study of our IALPA bro's in the team and a compare and contrast on contracts? It seems like a fairly benign request although I do remember that the scope report card was benign too. One would think the FPL accounting report issue would be benign too but au contraire.
Reply