Originally Posted by
Karnak
That's exactly how it works.
Outside the scope of the PWA, it's entirely up to the company.
Ok, you're really wrong here. Show me the LOA on the pilot lounge cameras. Which section of the contract covers the size and location of the parking lot huts? Who signed the MOU on the size of the v-files?
You complete me.
Karnak,
I'm almost to the point in time where I shouldn't discuss this with you, but if you really want to look smart in the future, Google:
* Mandatory subjects of bargaining. (Terms and Conditions of Employment- Discipline)
* Management Rights (Operational Control)
* Concerted Activity
Here are some cases for you to look into as well....
* Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB, 441 U.S. 488, 498 (1979)
*
Mary Thompson Hosp. v. NLRB, 943 F.2d 741, 745 (7th Cir.1991)
* Brewers and Maltsters, Local Union No. 6 v. NLRB, 414 F.3d 36, 45 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
* Colgate-Palmolive Co., 323 N.L.R.B. 515 (1997)
But, especially look at the Ford case.
If you think what you say is how it works, so be it. But, in Fords, the Supreme Court unanimously decided that Ford Motor Company couldn't even raise the price of food in their vending machines without bargaining with the union first. (The last two cases involve an employers improper use of video surveillance.)
If your extensive knowledge leads you to believe something contrary to what 9 Justices of the Supreme Court say, those cases say, and what I said in response to your earlier post, I'm all ears to find out why you would believe so.
New K Now