Originally Posted by
Karnak
Section 1.A defines who the bargaining agent is. it's unambiguous. What is a little ambiguous is the way the NMB views company actions during an organizing drive, or an election. Delta has earned re-voting for their actions during union elections. But this is not a union election. it's an organizing drive.
That's quite some back pedaling there dude. You started out with the complete BS statement that Delta would be in VIOLATION of Section 1 if they had allowed DPA on the property to campaign. Now even you know this was your latest example of stating pure BS.
The next example was your parroting the claim of others that DPA is management's wet dream. But as even you must know by now, people don't generally prohibit their wet dreams.
Don't know if DPA will ultimately be successful or not, but you are not helping ALPA's cause by spouting things that are so proveably wrong.
Carl