Originally Posted by
mooney
I really don't see how else to make you understand.....LEAVE OUT Pinnacle INC VS CORP for the purposes of this codeshare discussion. If Airline X buys airline Z and uses airline X's assets without merging the lists ets, it doesn't matter who airline Z codeshares with...you violated airline X's scope for the purposes of this discussion.
You are talking about something completely different than the relationship between Colgan and Pinnacle. I understand what you are talking about. You are saying that if Pinnacle INC bought an airline and started operating it as Pinnacle Inc, that would be a scope violation. That is correct, however in the case of Pinnacle vs Colgan both airlines were kept separate. This is not a violation of scope even if Pinnacle INC used its assets to form Pinnacle Holdings.