Originally Posted by
Mesabah
You are talking about something completely different than the relationship between Colgan and Pinnacle. I understand what you are talking about. You are saying that if Pinnacle INC bought an airline and started operating it as Pinnacle Inc, that would be a scope violation. That is correct, however in the case of Pinnacle vs Colgan both airlines were kept separate. This is not a violation of scope even if Pinnacle INC used its assets to form Pinnacle Holdings.
yes, but you had said that if Pinnacle inc bought an airline and used it as Pinnacle inc, they would not be in violation of codeshare if that other airline they bought was used as a feeder for CO/UA/insert non 'DL code here....that's what we are trying to make you see...if it was INC and run as COLGAN it would be in violation of scope even though Colgan doesn't feed DL...