Originally Posted by
Mesabah
You are talking about something completely different than the relationship between Colgan and Pinnacle. I understand what you are talking about. You are saying that if Pinnacle INC bought an airline and started operating it as Pinnacle Inc, that would be a scope violation. That is correct, however in the case of Pinnacle vs Colgan both airlines were kept separate. This is not a violation of scope even if Pinnacle INC used its assets to form Pinnacle Holdings.
Our scope said"any flying performed by pinnacle Inc must be flown by pinnacle Inc seniority pilots". So if Inc buys an airline and keeps it separate as you said it is in direct violation of that since the other airline if separate would not be on the Inc seniority list...