Originally Posted by
slowplay
From the report you linked:
DPA doesn't like something, so they go to management knowing that they could be putting a fellow pilot's job at risk?
Unreal how you point to this while ignoring ALPA's non-stop running to management everytime they thought they saw anything they could use to block free speech and free association. Any of these dozens of items and complaints could end up in some type of discipline for the DPA pilots because none of us knows what can be spun and used against you. Let me guess slow, you think that when the ALPA guys sent their constant stream evidence to ATL management against DPA, they meant it with only the best intentions?
Originally Posted by
slowplay
This is the kind of support Delta pilots who disagree with DPA can expect to receive from this group that wants to represent all Delta pilots?
I'm glad they fought against being maligned with a filthy video. If they had done nothing, you would have said: "How weak are these DPA guys...they can't even stand up for themselves. How are they going to stand up for us."
Originally Posted by
slowplay
I guess their professional standards organization is yet to be developed...
I see. Is that why the ALPA guys sent all their evidence against DPA straight to Professional Standards...instead of ATL management?
Originally Posted by
slowplay
I can only imagine the response of Spackler and DAL 88 if "DPA" and ALPA were reversed in this "report".
ALPA's actions that week were infinitely worse than anything DPA did. The only thing DPA did was defend itself against a filthy video that maligned the association. ALPA used every low blow trick in the book to block free speech and free association among Delta pilots. That fact alone should disgust everyone, and show how weak DALPA is.
Carl