Originally Posted by
slowplay
Hey, I wasn't the one that put the "who" into this discussion. You were the one that brought names into it. I'll be happy to stick to issues if you do. Seems the whole DPA argument has shifted away from issues and into whining about "mean C44 reps and Lee Moak." Nice.
I listened to MS speak at a C44 meeting right after he published his letter. His version of history was completely rebuffed by the R&I guys in attendance. He didn't have his "facts" anywhere close to right. That's why it was fantasy. It wasn't based in reality.
Funny. I was at that meeting and heard something completely different than what you describe. It's not possible that you would have any kind of agenda here, right? Nah!!!