Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Not true, and you know it. First, it is a perceived conflict of interest, and one that agreeably ALPA does little to discredit.
Actually, ALPA discredits the facts by using the exact same language you just did. All my LEC reps and the MEC chairman have used the phrase: "perceived conflict of interest" when I've spoken to them on the subject.
Truth is that ALPA's conflicted structure is the very definition of a conflict of interest. If this was an attorney/client relationship, agent/athlete relationship, or judge/advocate relationship it would be either illegal or prohibited under ethical standards.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
DALPA does not have a position for 2012. Why? Well, have you gotten a poll yet?
Many have been polled, but the majority of the questions are about the DPA. That's why DALPA doesn't have a position yet.
Carl