Originally Posted by
PCL_128
Carl, I'm curious how it is exactly that you think the NMB should behave. For a moment, let's say that you're a member of the NMB. And let's say a group of major airline pilots and their company come to you for mediation, and that pilot group is demanding a 52% pay raise. Their company is already losing money, and it's obvious to you and everyone else that a 52% increase to rates of pay, not to mention other demands that total up to about another 50% increase in payroll, would nearly instantly bankrupt the company. What would you do? What do you think the "right" thing to do for the NMB is in such a situation?
Similar things have happened many, many times before in the history of airline labor negotiations. In the past, when this happens, the NMB declares an impasse and both sides are released to pursue self-help. The union can strike, and the company can replace the entire work force. Both have happened many times before. NEVER BEFORE have we had this current situation of the NMB refusing to declare an impasse until THEIR view of a labor contract has been agreed to by labor. This has NEVER happened before. Instead of the NMB mediating on behalf of both sides, management currently has the NMB
arbitrating on
their behalf.
Originally Posted by
PCL_128
And please keep in mind that the entire purpose of the NMB is to assist in resolving labor disputes while avoiding disruptions in rail and air commerce.
They are to do so by using the historical methods that I've outlined above...not by removing the right to strike and arbitrating on behalf of management.
Carl