Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Complete the Mission

Old 01-25-2019, 03:51 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by squib View Post
First of all NO, that’s not how mainline operates hence my comment on the subject. Secondly, reads a bit conflicting. Agree or disagree?
Could you tell us more about your extensive personal experience with how mainline operates?
CanWeGetTheLeft is offline  
Old 01-25-2019, 07:10 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by squib View Post
The simple fact that some of you are responding with “occasionally but they work with you” or “they’ll let you off the hook” is just proving that it is happening and takes someone to actually stand up and say no. You guys obviously aren’t doing it when you should.



Squib,
Not sure what you're trying to accomplish with your comments. It happens everywhere to some extent. The majors are typically better staffed and have better maintained aircraft/maintenance capabilities from what I've seen.



I will give one example from my previous reference. Both Ice Detectors failed so the aircraft had to be ferried outside of freezing conditions. Dispatch/maintenance asked me to fly the plane back to the hub and stay out of the clouds. The freezing level was like 10k with partial cloudiness and the highest MEA's were around 6,000 which didn't give me much wiggle room if things got tight. I declined to do it. They said okay and I went on my way. You can decide if you think that was pushing, or not.


Making blanket statements like yours is not really helpful to the discussion at hand, although the whole topic is rather subjective. For all the time I spent there, Air Wisconsin was good to me and I wouldn't trade it for any other regional. Your mileage may vary.
BigWillyCapt is offline  
Old 01-26-2019, 04:27 AM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 314
Default

You will not know how dysfunctional and bad Air Wisconsin is until you leave for greener pastures. I will get chastised by the AW faithful for saying that.

It is a great group of people all in it together but the way that things operate at ZW are just bad. From the union to management inclusive of scheduling and staffing it is not a great place to work.

Great insurance and a great group of pilots, but not a great place to work. This should provide insight to the OP’s question, while also exhibiting the toxic relationship between ZW Alpa and ZW management.
http://m.aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/alpa-alleges-pilot-pushing-air-wisconsin

Granted this article is old and ESL is long gone, that was ALPA’s stance on it circa 2014.
PassportPlump is offline  
Old 01-29-2019, 01:40 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Posts: 35
Default

From the FO side, I recently ran into a day where the delays took us right to the edge of the duty day. The CA was called a few hours before the end of our duty day and advised of the duty "plus 30 minutes" time and the absolute "drop dead after 2 hour extension time". I, the FO, was never called. At 10 minutes prior to timing out, I called crew scheduling and asked what the plan was. They gave me the same times and said they were too busy to call everyone. They would just "assume" that I would work the extension unless I called them first. After a little research, they are only required to call the PIC (Captain) to ask for extra innings. (On this particular day, the CA said he was never really "asked" if he would go into overtime, just told the times.) Unless the FO claims fatigue, you are along for the ride. As previously stated, a fatigue call will put you in touch with a member of management but that is nothing to be afraid of. A good CA will ask the crew if they are willing to go into overtime before telling scheduling yes.

They are careful not to "pilot push" because they have lost legal arguments for it (I met one who claims to have a gotten a sizable little settlement for said act), but sometimes they can get closer than is comfortable. The "assumption" that you will go into overtime is what I don't like. If they called and asked "Say ... it's been a rough weather/maintenance day ... can you hang on for one more leg? Would you be willing to get this plane to the overnight?" I'm the kind of person that will help when asked ... the "assumption" is what ticks me off.
Cessnaflyer1213 is offline  
Old 01-29-2019, 10:07 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by PassportPlump View Post
You will not know how dysfunctional and bad Air Wisconsin is until you leave for greener pastures. I will get chastised by the AW faithful for saying that.
BINGO!

Originally Posted by PassportPlump View Post
It is a great group of people all in it together but the way that things operate at ZW are just bad. From the union to management inclusive of scheduling and staffing it is not a great place to work.
Another BINGO! I left out the link from the original post, look back to read further.


Originally Posted by Cessnaflyer1213 View Post
From the FO side, I recently ran into a day where the delays took us right to the edge of the duty day. The CA was called a few hours before the end of our duty day and advised of the duty "plus 30 minutes" time and the absolute "drop dead after 2 hour extension time". I, the FO, was never called. At 10 minutes prior to timing out, I called crew scheduling and asked what the plan was. They gave me the same times and said they were too busy to call everyone. They would just "assume" that I would work the extension unless I called them first. After a little research, they are only required to call the PIC (Captain) to ask for extra innings. (On this particular day, the CA said he was never really "asked" if he would go into overtime, just told the times.) Unless the FO claims fatigue, you are along for the ride. As previously stated, a fatigue call will put you in touch with a member of management but that is nothing to be afraid of. A good CA will ask the crew if they are willing to go into overtime before telling scheduling yes.

They are careful not to "pilot push" because they have lost legal arguments for it (I met one who claims to have a gotten a sizable little settlement for said act), but sometimes they can get closer than is comfortable. The "assumption" that you will go into overtime is what I don't like. If they called and asked "Say ... it's been a rough weather/maintenance day ... can you hang on for one more leg? Would you be willing to get this plane to the overnight?" I'm the kind of person that will help when asked ... the "assumption" is what ticks me off.

You are required to make your own assessment of fitment for duty. Period. It is not a team effort. Your awful hotel room on scheduled min rest may not have granted a decent nights sleep. Did housekeeping knock on your door at 7am when you have noon show and got in after 1am?

The fact that the assumption is there that you will accept ANY extension and you are instantly transferred to management is absurd. Neither extension is automatic or assumed. Maybe if they didn't build schedules that were legal by 12 minutes in the first place it wouldn't be an issue. 3 hour sit here, 2 hours, another 2 here. More sitting in the middle of nowhere airports than actually flying. Completely unproductive schedules. Those days are also usually found on 1 and 4 of your trip while in days 2 and 3 you sit in a hotel doing nothing with usually a gas station, waffle house, or subway nearby as "suitable eating." Enjoy!
squib is offline  
Old 01-30-2019, 06:52 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2018
Posts: 112
Default

Originally Posted by squib View Post
BINGO!


You are required to make your own assessment of fitment for duty. Period.


fit·ment

noun: fitment; plural noun: fitments
a fixed item of furniture or piece of equipment, especially in a house.
CanWeGetTheLeft is offline  
Old 01-30-2019, 03:54 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by CanWeGetTheLeft View Post


fit·ment

noun: fitment; plural noun: fitments
a fixed item of furniture or piece of equipment, especially in a house.

Thanks. Eye twitching.....ha that was the joke lol.
squib is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
53x11
Delta
50
10-13-2016 02:51 PM
Runner
Your Photos and Videos
0
12-28-2011 03:38 PM
FlyJSH
Hangar Talk
11
08-12-2011 08:45 PM
skycowboy
Flight Schools and Training
4
06-22-2007 08:45 PM
SGRogue
Cargo
17
01-19-2007 03:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices