![]() |
Looks like only four took CA upgrade on May Vacancy. This is fine
|
Originally Posted by WiscoAviator
(Post 3385913)
Looks like only four took CA upgrade on May Vacancy. This is fine
|
Originally Posted by cornerpocket
(Post 3386057)
What's the implication of only four taking the CA upgrade?
|
Originally Posted by cornerpocket
(Post 3386057)
What's the implication of only four taking the CA upgrade?
|
Originally Posted by WiscoAviator
(Post 3386252)
The issue is the net change. If we gain four but lose 15 each month on a list of approximately 300 CAs, it doesn't take long to have really detrimental effects.
|
Originally Posted by cornerpocket
(Post 3386300)
That makes sense. It doesn't sound like too many people are a fan of Dayton. From the outside looking in, what makes Dayton so undesirable?
|
Originally Posted by cornerpocket
(Post 3386300)
That makes sense. It doesn't sound like too many people are a fan of Dayton. From the outside looking in, what makes Dayton so undesirable?
|
Originally Posted by WiscoAviator
(Post 3386252)
The issue is the net change. If we gain four but lose 15 each month on a list of approximately 300 CAs, it doesn't take long to have really detrimental effects.
|
Originally Posted by Imapylot
(Post 3386765)
Speaking of approximately 300 CAs, does anyone know if we ever got back up to the contractually required 305+ CA number?
|
Who is eligible for the $1500?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:50 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands