Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Alaska (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/)
-   -   I'm calling it. We're geting bought. (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/115823-im-calling-were-geting-bought.html)

Baradium 08-06-2018 12:07 PM


Originally Posted by Jetlife (Post 2649996)
I doubt it, if scope isn't violated and both parties vote it in, it shouldn't cost them anything... UAL could dump the 190s and take the Airbus only, done deal.

Jet Blue scope requires no outside flying and United has a lot of it. The United pilots are smart enough to at least take advantage of that to get something from the company. So yes, scope would be violated unless ALPA agreed to change scope.

Jetlife 08-06-2018 12:12 PM


Originally Posted by Baradium (Post 2650012)
Jet Blue scope requires no outside flying and United has a lot of it. The United pilots are smart enough to at least take advantage of that to get something from the company. So yes, scope would be violated unless ALPA agreed to change scope.

The no outside flying from a scope standpoint is completely irrelevant. If JB is acquired by United, they are 100% mainline and would adhere to United's scope clause.

seekingblue 08-06-2018 12:14 PM


Originally Posted by Jetlife (Post 2650014)
The no outside flying from a scope standpoint is completely irrelevant. If JB is acquired by United, they are 100% mainline and would adhere to United's scope clause.

Sort of.

We would need to get a Joint CBA (since it would be ALPA-ALPA) and that document would have scope limits.

Jetlife 08-06-2018 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by seekingblue (Post 2650018)
Sort of.

We would need to get a Joint CBA (since it would be ALPA-ALPA) and that document would have scope limits.

100% and both parties would vote to approve the JCBA. Neither party will vote in a scope violation. But the JB pilot group knows that if United bought them tomorrow, that United has regional flying. I don’t think that is even a consideration on whether to buy JB or not from an added cost because of scope standpoint. UAL management could try it and hope it goes to arbitration but as we have seen, an arbitrator is not likely to mess with scope 🤣🤣

symbian simian 08-06-2018 04:02 PM


Originally Posted by seekingblue (Post 2650018)
Sort of.

We would need to get a Joint CBA (since it would be ALPA-ALPA) and that document would have scope limits.

I'm going to go out on a limb here, but if you offered a UAL contract to B6 pilots, and they get to keep DOH for pay, and get stapled for seniority, I wouldn't be surprised if it passes. Don't think scope would be the major issue.

Clear Right 08-06-2018 07:10 PM


Originally Posted by symbian simian (Post 2650158)
I'm going to go out on a limb here, but if you offered a UAL contract to B6 pilots, and they get to keep DOH for pay, and get stapled for seniority, I wouldn't be surprised if it passes. Don't think scope would be the major issue.

No way a B6 pilot would give up seniority for UAL $264/hr A320 vs B6 $259/hr A320, unless I’m missing something on pay rates? Why would you give up seniority for $5 an hour?

Klsytakesit 08-06-2018 08:08 PM


Originally Posted by Clear Right (Post 2650256)
No way a B6 pilot would give up seniority for UAL $264/hr A320 vs B6 $259/hr A320, unless I’m missing something on pay rates? Why would you give up seniority for $5 an hour?

You are...A super regional and a major international carrier with widebody pay rates and so on and so forth and such.....

symbian simian 08-06-2018 08:36 PM


Originally Posted by Clear Right (Post 2650256)
No way a B6 pilot would give up seniority for UAL $264/hr A320 vs B6 $259/hr A320, unless I’m missing something on pay rates? Why would you give up seniority for $5 an hour?

Because 5 year FO pay on the wide body is $80 more than on the 190? (I know, not a fair comparison, just like comparing your senior aircraft to their junior aircraft isn’t fair)

keysersose 08-07-2018 07:05 AM


Originally Posted by symbian simian (Post 2650158)
I'm going to go out on a limb here, but if you offered a UAL contract to B6 pilots, and they get to keep DOH for pay, and get stapled for seniority, I wouldn't be surprised if it passes. Don't think scope would be the major issue.


Not a chance. Wouldn’t trade QOL for anything.

seekingblue 08-07-2018 07:55 AM


Originally Posted by keysersose (Post 2650448)
Not a chance. Wouldn’t trade QOL for anything.

It’s funny to me that this discussion is happening in the Alaska sub forum— but I digress.

Many (most) Jetblue guys re either ex regional guys like myself or they are Usair guys who got furloughed. I this this changes our perspective.

I’ve been on the other side of the fence and seen how lack of scope hurts mainline jobs and mainline QOL.

If United were to buy us, we would be an even more divided pilot group. The bottom 1/2 of the list would be overjoyed that they can upgrade and fly heavy metal. The top 1/2 would be ****ed that they are going to get shafted on seniority integration. Sort of a win/lose depending on seniority


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands