Airline Pilot Central Forums
Page 2 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Alaska (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/)
-   -   340.25 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/alaska/144252-340-25-a.html)

ReluctantEskimo 08-21-2023 04:53 PM
Originally Posted by All Bizniz (Post 3686114)
The 82% were on to something...
Let's not go that far. This was a huge favor done by the company to correct the weak language written in the CBA.

This is a great win, to be sure. But don't even think about saying this was by design.

OTZeagle1 08-21-2023 05:20 PM
Originally Posted by ShyGuy (Post 3686071)
Wow. Didn't see that one coming. Thank you to all involved! :cool:


Now OTZ gets to gloat for calling out the magic happening Sept 1. This is above/beyond the contractual requirement since Southwest hasn't signed and UA wouldn't sign until October.
Yup even a clock is right 2x a day. Basic economics, but the 30 will never understand.

MAGIC!

CordovaCA 08-21-2023 05:20 PM
Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo (Post 3686119)
Let's not go that far. This was a huge favor done by the company to correct the weak language written in the CBA.

This is a great win, to be sure. But don't even think about saying this was by design.
Uhh this was exactly the intended design. Nobody seriously thought 3 airlines would still be negotiating. The language was intended to keep our rates in the mix. Perhaps you'd rather be in SWA shoes? No thanks for me. I'm still with the 82%.

ReluctantEskimo 08-21-2023 05:22 PM
Originally Posted by CordovaCA (Post 3686134)
Nobody seriously thought 3 airlines would still be negotiating.
Why not? Sounds like poor planning.

Again. The company did us a huge solid to overlook our lack of imagination. Celebrate today. We can fight another day.

PNWFlyer 08-21-2023 05:25 PM
Originally Posted by CordovaCA (Post 3686134)
Uhh this was exactly the intended design. Nobody seriously thought 3 airlines would still be negotiating. The language was intended to keep our rates in the mix. Perhaps you'd rather be in SWA shoes? No thanks for me. I'm still with the 82%.
his small mind thinks SWA will get full retro.

ReluctantEskimo 08-21-2023 05:26 PM
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer (Post 3686137)
his small mind thinks SWA will get full retro.
You seem really torqued off for someone who just got an 11% raise outside of the bounds of the contract. Take the win.

PNWFlyer 08-21-2023 05:27 PM
Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo (Post 3686135)
Why not? Sounds like poor planning.

Again. The company did us a huge solid to overlook our lack of imagination. Celebrate today. We can fight another day.
not wasn’t a lack of imagination it was what they could negotiate. Not sure why I think you could possibly understand that simple concept.

Flaps1check 08-21-2023 06:05 PM
If you don’t know who’s on our NC you should familiarize yourself. Last ones was good, this is better.

echelon 08-21-2023 06:07 PM
Originally Posted by PNWFlyer (Post 3686139)
not wasn’t a lack of imagination it was what they could negotiate. Not sure why I think you could possibly understand that simple concept.
It was what they negotiated because they knew you, along with everyone who was terrified of a recession or were too impatient to wait for the language we deserved, would vote yes for it even though it had the potential to end up functionally useless. Not sure why I think you could possibly understand that simple concept.

ReluctantEskimo 08-21-2023 06:08 PM
Originally Posted by Flaps1check (Post 3686166)
If you don’t know who’s on our NC you should familiarize yourself. Last ones was good, this is better.
I am in complete agreement.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:01 AM.
Page 2 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands