![]() |
Originally Posted by yallMahomies
(Post 3819604)
HNL will shrink for sure. Majority of the 787s will be out of SEA if Alaska can figure out the gate situation with seatac (don't really have high hopes for that). If AS figures it out, East Asia plus SYD & MEL can be done right. The amount of travelers connecting down to SFO and LAX to go across the Pacific is very high and if managment can take advantage of that then the WBs can be useful. If done right, SEA will have 787 & 737 while the rest of the bases are 737 equipped. Intresting to see how it will play out. Not looking forward to the 2 year seat lock on the 787...warning to the NHs
|
Originally Posted by Jet J
(Post 3819609)
Just heard SFO WB base in the works. Hence the move to the new terminal.
|
If anything SFO dies in the next 5ish years. The WB future will most certainly be out of SEA if not HNL. Alaska wants to monpolize seatac and DL taking Asia 330 routes was a stab in the back to management
|
Originally Posted by Jet J
(Post 3819609)
Just heard SFO WB base in the works. Hence the move to the new terminal.
SFO terminal move has been in the works for years. SFO = Gateway to Asia = Lots of established long haul competition. Not exactly the kind of market the Anglers like to rush into. I'd believe SFO closing long before I'd believe WB's there. Frankly they'd be better off closing it, if they can crew the flying out of other bases, and maybe open one or two botique domiciles in towns where other majors don't have bases (ex AUS, SAN). If you actually want to live in the Bay, why would you stay at AS vice UAL??? |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3819623)
Bahahaha.
SFO terminal move has been in the works for years. SFO = Gateway to Asia = Lots of established long haul competition. Not exactly the kind of market the Anglers like to rush into. I'd believe SFO closing long before I'd believe WB's there. Frankly they'd be better off closing it, if they can crew the flying out of other bases, and maybe open one or two botique domiciles in towns where other majors don't have bases (ex AUS, SAN). If you actually want to live in the Bay, why would you stay at AS vice UAL??? |
Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
(Post 3819636)
It's the one of the bases where there's actually room and business for WBs. LAX nope. SEA big nope. PDX maybe. ANC yes. But if pax WBs start flying in Alaska, make sure the last one turns off the lights before you leave.
Business? Yes. Lots of competition? Yes. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3819641)
Room? Yes.
Business? Yes. Lots of competition? Yes. LAX won't have widebodies because we pledged our fealty to OneWorld. PDX might have widebodies but the market there isn't as strong. ANC doesn't have the population. So that leaves HNL and SFO. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3819623)
Bahahaha.
SFO terminal move has been in the works for years. SFO = Gateway to Asia = Lots of established long haul competition. Not exactly the kind of market the Anglers like to rush into. I'd believe SFO closing long before I'd believe WB's there. Frankly they'd be better off closing it, if they can crew the flying out of other bases, and maybe open one or two botique domiciles in towns where other majors don't have bases (ex AUS, SAN). If you actually want to live in the Bay, why would you stay at AS vice UAL??? |
Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
(Post 3819646)
I’d believe SFO/HNL. Seattle, ANC, LAX sound most restrictive.
|
Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
(Post 3819646)
I’d believe SFO/HNL. Seattle, ANC, LAX sound most restrictive.
Nobody in their right mind would stay, unless they live in ANC and absolutely want to eventually be based at home. I've met several ex-AS pilots commuting to SFO from PDX, so even PDX won't keep them. But I guess having a WB option in SFO might mitigate the bleeding just a bit. But it's still going to be hard to compete with UAL, which will be hiring for at least anothe decade. Again it's not just about SFO, almost all new-hires go to SFO and the majority then resign within a year. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:35 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands