Search

Notices

Contract negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2024 | 05:45 PM
  #1851  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 20
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
Anybody else getting any info or updates on the hearing?

I'm getting radio silence from my sources about the hearing. I still cannot believe that we are on our FOURTH negotiating committee since january...

Management is gonna get to keep us on the cheap until 2026-2027 without even trying to stall/delay negotiations because of the drama and infighting within the union.
You may be in the ballpark what with having to ramp up yet another NC & the revelation there have yet been no discussions with the co. on pay, scheduling, or retirement. The big ticket sections. Could easily eat up a couple years.
Reply
Old 05-04-2024 | 10:02 AM
  #1852  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 513
Likes: 70
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702
Anybody else getting any info or updates on the hearing?

I'm getting radio silence from my sources about the hearing. I still cannot believe that we are on our FOURTH negotiating committee since january...

Management is gonna get to keep us on the cheap until 2026-2027 without even trying to stall/delay negotiations because of the drama and infighting within the union.
From the Hearing, the 3 person panel has 60 days to give the National president their recommondation. At that point the President has 15 days to let all parties know his ruling on if the Trusty ship stays or if that is discontinued and the old EXCO would be back.

Based on the Hearing evidence and comments I would find it very unlikely that the Trust ship would not continue.

The Old Exco will not be back. As far as them getting fired the union does not have any say in that. They all work for Allegiant not the union. The only option the union could do is have a hearing to remove them from being members of IBT. They would still have to pay dues but would not be able to run for office again or vote. If they did not pay dues then the union could ask Allegiant to let them go per the contract.

It would be hard to see a way any of them would get voted in in the future so the time and effort to remove them as members probably not worth it. We will see.

Any criminal charges would have to come from the Department of Labor. I would be suprised if any of this would be worth their effort or time either, but you never know.

The trusty will be running the union for the next 18th months would be my guess.
Reply
Old 05-04-2024 | 10:07 AM
  #1853  
pipercub's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 513
Likes: 70
From: MD80 CA
Default

Originally Posted by tailendcharlie
You may be in the ballpark what with having to ramp up yet another NC & the revelation there have yet been no discussions with the co. on pay, scheduling, or retirement. The big ticket sections. Could easily eat up a couple years.
The fact that no discussions on pay or any of those sections where true since before all this happened. The Medeator has yet to allow those sections to be passed or neg on yet. The Medeator controlls what section are talked about. Any numbers flotting around are just rumors as this has yet been talked about. I would think the company and the union each have their numbers they feel are approprate, however they have not yet neg with each other on any of those yet.
Reply
Old 05-04-2024 | 06:00 PM
  #1854  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 16
Default

told from a person who was able to listen to the last union zoom: the negotiating committe was replaced AGAIN. Reason was that they "remained loyal to AR". Company sent email saying 2 more sections were done, union says that is no longer the case. Since i dont have anyone's name, whoever sat across from Uncle M agreed to forced upgrades and cell phone tracking along with having to download company programs on your personal devices. I have no idea what all the big brains at Teamster's National think, but this has to be the biggest poison pill I've seen as a pilot. No company that actually wanted a contract would push for that, has to be like a 99% no vote on any of those. Best guess, since Boeing is having so many issues, no contract is needed. Leverage is lost, company can sit tight filling classes with CFIs and FNs with the empty promise of a retention bonus that most likely wont be seen for several years. Hope I am wrong, and good luck
Reply
Old 05-05-2024 | 08:19 AM
  #1855  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 142
Likes: 28
From: Airbus Captain
Default

At this point, in the clown show, I'm not holding my breath for a contract. I thought we were going to have a TA to vote on last year. Now...I just want to see AR off the seniority list ASAP!
Reply
Old 05-05-2024 | 12:16 PM
  #1856  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by pipercub
From the Hearing, the 3 person panel has 60 days to give the National president their recommondation. At that point the President has 15 days to let all parties know his ruling on if the Trusty ship stays or if that is discontinued and the old EXCO would be back.

Based on the Hearing evidence and comments I would find it very unlikely that the Trust ship would not continue.

The Old Exco will not be back. As far as them getting fired the union does not have any say in that. They all work for Allegiant not the union. The only option the union could do is have a hearing to remove them from being members of IBT. They would still have to pay dues but would not be able to run for office again or vote. If they did not pay dues then the union could ask Allegiant to let them go per the contract.

It would be hard to see a way any of them would get voted in in the future so the time and effort to remove them as members probably not worth it. We will see.

Any criminal charges would have to come from the Department of Labor. I would be suprised if any of this would be worth their effort or time either, but you never know.

The trusty will be running the union for the next 18th months would be my guess.
I would hope the Department of Labor wouldn’t be to lazy to prosecute the guy who single handily destroyed this union group. The unions money shouldn’t be an eccentric persons piggy bank.
Reply
Old 05-05-2024 | 12:55 PM
  #1857  
Margaritaville's Avatar
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by G4er
I would hope the Department of Labor wouldn’t be to lazy to prosecute the guy who single handily destroyed this union group. The unions money shouldn’t be an eccentric persons piggy bank.
Contact your Senator. Describe the situation dramatically. Demand a DOL investigation. Especially if you're in a conservative state where lying stealing and cheating union bosses aren't favored.
Reply
Old 05-10-2024 | 05:06 PM
  #1858  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 640
Likes: 27
Default

Those Fedex love notes with the proposed T&C's they sent 18 months ago aren't looking so bad now.
Reply
Old 05-10-2024 | 07:19 PM
  #1859  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 20
From: CA
Default

Leverage is gone, filling classes, still all the tough sections to go, sentiment is growing to rewrite work rules line-by-line. I'm back to predicting 2026 or later.
Reply
Old 05-10-2024 | 09:03 PM
  #1860  
Captainbfv's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 419
Likes: 18
From: Capi the Chapi
Default

Originally Posted by tailendcharlie
Leverage is gone, filling classes, still all the tough sections to go, sentiment is growing to rewrite work rules line-by-line. I'm back to predicting 2026 or later.
Leverage is gone? I hear ya, but when you say that, what do you mean exactly? Did Robles waste time and give up leverage? Time YES, leverage? Well maybe. The company knew with whom they were dealing. An idiot, a BSr, a fool that proped himself to a level that only he and a few truly believed in. The company knows what it will give to the pilot group that will benefit them and their plans. When Maury negotiated directly with that idiot (AR) he extended an olive branch to the pilots, in hopes to get Robles to grasp "The business model"; in hopes he would understand that in this business it takes some giving and taking. But Robles was so arrogant, that he missed the opportunity to find common ground and provide a win to the pilots while giving a win to the ********ng people that sign the checks.

Robles failed miserably. Has "leverage" been lost?, maybe, but only if the majority of the pilot group wants to bite the hand that feeds them. The MAJORITY OF THIS PILOT GROUP DEMANDS THESE THINGS...

1- INDUSTRY STANDARD PAY FOR A319/320
2- INDUSTRY STANDARD LTD
3- INDUSTRY STANDARD DC 401K
4- INDUSTRY LEADING SCOPE
5- INDUSTRY STANDARD MIN DAY GUARANTEE
6- INDUSTRY STANDARD DUTY RIG

KEEP ALLEGIANT WHAT MAKES ALLEGIANT. BUT COMPESATE YOUR PILOTS ACCORDINGLY!!!! You CANNOT FU*** PILOTS FOR FREE. Keep your business model, but don't think for one second that it will WON'T COST YOU. Wanna keep your business model? Pay up! Because without paying, it's straight up abuse!!!

Last edited by Captainbfv; 05-10-2024 at 09:14 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
tallplt
Major
28
06-17-2012 10:23 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
ITSALLGOOD
Major
1
07-07-2007 08:34 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices