Search
Notices

Why or why not Allegiant

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2024, 03:22 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 650
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
That’s not all he said.
okay tom, then tell me what I missed?

If Andrew's strategy to getting a contract is telling the mediators and management that AA, UA, AA, B6 and AS are our peers then he is more naive than even i thought...
captnate702 is offline  
Old 02-06-2024, 08:01 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captainbfv's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2016
Position: Gear Biatch
Posts: 266
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702 View Post
And then he said something about unstacking which still seems like his favorite pet project.
And this is what's gonna cost us everything.
Captainbfv is offline  
Old 02-06-2024, 08:26 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 650
Default

Originally Posted by Captainbfv View Post
And this is what's gonna cost us everything.
If the new NC spend a year arguing about unstacking we’ll know Andrew is still pulling the strings during negotiations.

The man is a walking hypocrisy at every turn. Negotiations are going well, but let’s burn some money on some billboards that all anybody can see is “BIG GAME!” (Might be even worse than “stop testing our patience). And then renting three buses to drive ten people to picket at headquarters is the definition of amateur hour. It would have been better to cancel the picket instead of showing up with ten people.

Now management knows exactly how little the pilot group thinks of our union leadership. Andrew just showed management how little influence and sway he has over this pilot group.

Best thing that could happen for us at this point is Andrew get removed, new blood takes over and energizes and unifies the pilot group.
captnate702 is offline  
Old 02-07-2024, 09:56 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,941
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702 View Post
okay tom, then tell me what I missed?

If Andrew's strategy to getting a contract is telling the mediators and management that AA, UA, AA, B6 and AS are our peers then he is more naive than even i thought...
You need to listen to it again. If you are going to tell us all that nothing more was said by robles on the topic of how he defines industry standard, then fine, I will call you out again and post what you missed. But I'm not going to waste my time re-listening to it unless you need called out. Tell the world how you want it.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 02-07-2024, 01:53 PM
  #75  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: B757
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702 View Post
A question I keep asking myself and others is what does “industry standard” contract mean?

1. Is it a legacy standard contract where we only compare ourselves to larger more established airlines like AS, B6, DL, AA, UA, WN?

2. Does industry standard mean where we sit in the industry compared to our peers? Think NK, F9, SC, Avelo and Breeze?

I can assure you that “industry standard” does not mean a “legacy standard” contract to management. I am certain that management thinks we are way closer to tiny Avelo than to the big four.

For example, if we get a TA that “industry leading” for ULCC airlines but short of a legacy standard contract - how does that workout?

If the hope is that we will get a legacy standard contract then I think we will be in mediation for a decade.

Remember, the mediator we have was management at F9 and NK for a long time, I don’t think she’s gonna be impressed when Andrew says we should be released because management won’t match delta rates.
Should be an average of all of the above airlines you mentioned except Breeze and Avelo. It's not resonable to compare with non unionized airlines that have never negotiated anything in the past and only have company work rules. The contract comparisons from the union include Sun Country and Frontier which have expired contracts or close to it so some items are outdated. I don't think the company or union is out of touch with where the industry has recently moved to or what is a fair blend of airlines to dictate what's standard. The other contracts in the industry have taken 3-4 years from expiration to negotiate except the contract extentions (UPS and NK). I think you will see a TA pretty close to the 3 year mark which will be this fall, give or take a few months.
Bitcoin is offline  
Old 02-07-2024, 04:24 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 650
Default

Originally Posted by Bitcoin View Post
Should be an average of all of the above airlines you mentioned except Breeze and Avelo. It's not resonable to compare with non unionized airlines that have never negotiated anything in the past and only have company work rules. The contract comparisons from the union include Sun Country and Frontier which have expired contracts or close to it so some items are outdated. I don't think the company or union is out of touch with where the industry has recently moved to or what is a fair blend of airlines to dictate what's standard. The other contracts in the industry have taken 3-4 years from expiration to negotiate except the contract extentions (UPS and NK). I think you will see a TA pretty close to the 3 year mark which will be this fall, give or take a few months.
this makes sense to me. I agree that management knows what it’s gonna take to get a TA voted in. I thought that when management did the retention bonus that they would pretend that was enough of a raise. Surprisingly they haven’t done that so I think you’re they probably do have an understanding of the big items: compensation, LTD, retirement.

where MG will die before he moves towards “industry standard” is in work rules that compromise his precious flexibility and “variable schedule”. This is where I think we will spend 2-3 years in negotiation. Andrew has made it clear he wants “industry standard” work rules aka scheduling rules. (December 2022 he said he wanted industry leading work rules with a 0% unstack but he seems to have come off of that).

Andrew also will roll over in his grave before he allows us to vote on a TA that does not have his scheduling rules (aka unstacking).
captnate702 is offline  
Old 02-07-2024, 07:31 PM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: B757
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by captnate702 View Post
this makes sense to me. I agree that management knows what it’s gonna take to get a TA voted in. I thought that when management did the retention bonus that they would pretend that was enough of a raise. Surprisingly they haven’t done that so I think you’re they probably do have an understanding of the big items: compensation, LTD, retirement.

where MG will die before he moves towards “industry standard” is in work rules that compromise his precious flexibility and “variable schedule”. This is where I think we will spend 2-3 years in negotiation. Andrew has made it clear he wants “industry standard” work rules aka scheduling rules. (December 2022 he said he wanted industry leading work rules with a 0% unstack but he seems to have come off of that).

Andrew also will roll over in his grave before he allows us to vote on a TA that does not have his scheduling rules (aka unstacking).
They have said they will agree to what the industry has or even below standard with no staffing model or unstacking. The standard unstack/staffing model would require the company to hire quite a bit more but deleting any staffing model with no unstack would allow the company to continue to run lean. The company has to be ecstatic with that since their end goal is acheived. I don't think section 15 will be to difficult to TA, but I can't say the same about some of the work rules as you mention, the min day for example won't be easy.
Bitcoin is offline  
Old 02-08-2024, 02:14 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by Bitcoin View Post
They have said they will agree to what the industry has or even below standard with no staffing model or unstacking. The standard unstack/staffing model would require the company to hire quite a bit more but deleting any staffing model with no unstack would allow the company to continue to run lean. The company has to be ecstatic with that since their end goal is acheived. I don't think section 15 will be to difficult to TA, but I can't say the same about some of the work rules as you mention, the min day for example won't be easy.
AR chose to help the SR pilots and the company and as a byproduct the company runs leaner with the agreement to allow pilots to pick up VFNs on their vacations. Despite all the talk I look at actions. Expect more of the same with the next TA they put out.
G4er is offline  
Old 02-08-2024, 11:14 AM
  #79  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2023
Posts: 2
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
You need to listen to it again.
Is this something that can be linked to? Would like to take a listen.
PilotPoster is offline  
Old 02-08-2024, 07:08 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pipercub's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: MD80 CA
Posts: 318
Default

Originally Posted by PilotPoster View Post
Is this something that can be linked to? Would like to take a listen.
No this is an internal union meeting. Current pilots can find on union page.
pipercub is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Captainbfv
Allegiant
41
07-21-2020 07:46 AM
crxpilot
Allegiant
18
01-21-2019 09:10 AM
rickair7777
Allegiant
13
04-22-2015 12:48 PM
Route66
Allegiant
1
04-02-2015 03:44 AM
pilotswife
Allegiant
21
09-25-2006 07:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices