| captnate702 |
05-20-2025 02:07 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitcoin
(Post 3913792)
It normally doesn't since every other airline has a staffing model with unstacking as their backup plan. Here, the company wants no staffing model so they can staff less and cover all of the peak summer and holiday flying with 70% unstacked on. After the bid is done then all the extra open time gets dumped on lineholders regardless of seniority to cover all the trips so you can carry less pilots.
Why do you only mention what the union is passing? If you know what the union is passing then you must know that the company is passing. They want no min staffing levels or one they can reduce headcount with and use stacking as primary method in peak months and staff just enough.
|
I know what the union has passed, not sure what’s going on lately. I also know that the prior NC said that management put United’s staffing model into one of the company’s passes. Don’t know what happened to it, that was a while ago.
Management at the training center a couple years ago made a big deal about “an industry standard staffing model” because it was based on block hours per pilot. Go look at any ALPA or legacy contract and the staffing model is block hours, no aircraft per pilot.
Not trying to make icebergs out of snowflakes but unstacking is not how you preserve jobs. Staffing models are job protection. Pilots have been worried about job protection decades before PBS was even around. Not sure why these ridiculous people in management and the union are fighting about unstack when they should be talking staffing model to save our jobs.
|