AA Class Drops
#981
Minimum AVERAGE per day, yes.
For example:
Day 1- fly 6 hrs
Day 2- fly 6 hrs
Day 3- fly 2 hrs
Day 4- fly 6 hrs
In the above example, if you have an ACD of 5hrs, you do not get 5hrs for day 3, since your total trip averages 5hrs/day. And yes, it’s a minimum, so your trip has to pay that average as a minimum whether you fly 1 minute or not at all.
If the above example was a true MINIMUM CALENDAR DAY of 5hrs, it would pay 23hrs vs 20 as an ACD.
For example:
Day 1- fly 6 hrs
Day 2- fly 6 hrs
Day 3- fly 2 hrs
Day 4- fly 6 hrs
In the above example, if you have an ACD of 5hrs, you do not get 5hrs for day 3, since your total trip averages 5hrs/day. And yes, it’s a minimum, so your trip has to pay that average as a minimum whether you fly 1 minute or not at all.
If the above example was a true MINIMUM CALENDAR DAY of 5hrs, it would pay 23hrs vs 20 as an ACD.
#982
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 6th place
Posts: 1,826
This has had me a bit perplexed as I follow this topic in the AA forums...
AA is going to be implementing **Average** calendar day, right? In other words, not a true min calendar day. I'm trying to understand the excitement to just be going to average calendar day. Is the current system that bad to be seeing gains from moving to ACD?
AA is going to be implementing **Average** calendar day, right? In other words, not a true min calendar day. I'm trying to understand the excitement to just be going to average calendar day. Is the current system that bad to be seeing gains from moving to ACD?
DL and UA have average calendar day. SWA has minimum calendar day.
You don’t understand the excitement of redeyes and other slash trips going from 11-12 hours of pay to 15:30?
Also, no more 10 day off lines full of redeyes. 13 off will be the min with a 90 hr line.
#983
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 85
This has had me a bit perplexed as I follow this topic in the AA forums...
AA is going to be implementing **Average** calendar day, right? In other words, not a true min calendar day. I'm trying to understand the excitement to just be going to average calendar day. Is the current system that bad to be seeing gains from moving to ACD?
AA is going to be implementing **Average** calendar day, right? In other words, not a true min calendar day. I'm trying to understand the excitement to just be going to average calendar day. Is the current system that bad to be seeing gains from moving to ACD?
Yes, it’s that horrible. I once had a 19 day schedule that paid 76 hrs. How this union ever agreed to not pay people to sit in a hotel away from home is astounding.
#984
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
This has had me a bit perplexed as I follow this topic in the AA forums...
AA is going to be implementing **Average** calendar day, right? In other words, not a true min calendar day. I'm trying to understand the excitement to just be going to average calendar day. Is the current system that bad to be seeing gains from moving to ACD?
AA is going to be implementing **Average** calendar day, right? In other words, not a true min calendar day. I'm trying to understand the excitement to just be going to average calendar day. Is the current system that bad to be seeing gains from moving to ACD?
AA currently has average duty PERIOD pay. You can go fly a trip that touches 3 calendar days, but only has 2 duty periods, so you can get as low as 10:20 for a trip that touches 3 days. ACD will change that, but most likely will chance how trips are constructed too.
#985
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 175
Very minor amount, but I believe under the new, yet to be implemented ACD, that type of 3 day you are referring to would actually pay 15:45 and not 15:30. I believe they agreed to 5:15 like Delta has.
#986
#987
From an outsider that is keenly interested in AA, those numbers are pretty astounding and eye-opening (eye-watering even?? ) that trips could credit so poorly like that.
Had a PHX AA guy on my jumpseat recently and he likened his schedules to working at a giant regional airline, but the way you guys describe some of the possible trip scenarios/days off makes it sound worse than a lot of regionals!
I'm looking forward to hearing about the positive changes that ACD brings to your flying and credit once it's implemented. I'm glad to hear that there are improvements on the horizon.
Had a PHX AA guy on my jumpseat recently and he likened his schedules to working at a giant regional airline, but the way you guys describe some of the possible trip scenarios/days off makes it sound worse than a lot of regionals!
I'm looking forward to hearing about the positive changes that ACD brings to your flying and credit once it's implemented. I'm glad to hear that there are improvements on the horizon.
#988
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,101
From an outsider that is keenly interested in AA, those numbers are pretty astounding and eye-opening (eye-watering even?? ) that trips could credit so poorly like that.
Had a PHX AA guy on my jumpseat recently and he likened his schedules to working at a giant regional airline, but the way you guys describe some of the possible trip scenarios/days off makes it sound worse than a lot of regionals!
I'm looking forward to hearing about the positive changes that ACD brings to your flying and credit once it's implemented. I'm glad to hear that there are improvements on the horizon.
Had a PHX AA guy on my jumpseat recently and he likened his schedules to working at a giant regional airline, but the way you guys describe some of the possible trip scenarios/days off makes it sound worse than a lot of regionals!
I'm looking forward to hearing about the positive changes that ACD brings to your flying and credit once it's implemented. I'm glad to hear that there are improvements on the horizon.
Yes the flying is regionalish...basically what mainline did before the CRJ-900 and ERJ-170 took over. But people will ***** because they "don't want that flying". Just be happy we are finally doing it again, sheesh.
#989
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 108
FWIW I've only been here four years and got 18 off this month / mid 70's credit and next month have 14 days off and 88 credit. Not a single red-eye.
Yes the flying is regionalish...basically what mainline did before the CRJ-900 and ERJ-170 took over. But people will ***** because they "don't want that flying". Just be happy we are finally doing it again, sheesh.
Yes the flying is regionalish...basically what mainline did before the CRJ-900 and ERJ-170 took over. But people will ***** because they "don't want that flying". Just be happy we are finally doing it again, sheesh.
These 10-14 days off schedules is why most of us wanted to leave the regionals, so we could actually have a life outside of work gone from home in some hotel somewhere. That is regional contract BS right there. Seeing all the 10-13 day off schedules people got this month are scary. That is worse than we had at our regional. Hopefully there will be an improvement with the 5:15 thing but that is yet to be seen. There needs to be min scheduled days off written in stone in the contract and it needs to say 15 RSV or LNE. If you want to go below that "voluntarily", be my guest.
I understand SWA is way more efficient with their scheduling but we need to do something other than just pay rates in this next contract. Or we need a different less wasteful way of scheduling things. Pay rates is all anyone ever seems to want when contract time comes around. Pay rates, Pay rates, Pay rates. Pay is useless if you have no life at home other than packing and doing laundry for the next trip and heading right back out the door working more than a regional new hire. The "pay rates" are pretty good now, (except for profit sharing which is atrocious compared to peers). Now everything else QOL/contract wise needs to improve significantly.
Last edited by Regionalsuck; 05-22-2018 at 06:56 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post