![]() |
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 2409510)
DL 2015(?) civilian avg was 7600 TT and 4100 PIC.
I was hearing that if you had more than 8k-10k TT you were overqualified ans considered un-trainable at DL. |
Originally Posted by itsmytime
(Post 2409196)
Nobody minds reality, but let's have it on both sides of the coin. So if bombs fall on NK, does everybody at the airlines stop aging? Retirements are coming regardless of what happens in the world. You would need massive shrinkage of over 5% a year to not need to hire for retirements. And that's just the mandatories. To say nothing of those that leave before 65 or lose their medical, LTD etc.
We are already starting to see some furloughing from the top with single FOS and PBS being implemented. I am guessing somewhere between 8%-10% less folks needed. Hard to tell from the recent seniority list since it also purged the remaining furloughees. In the even of another black swan event, I predict that 10% would be gone almost immediately and another 5%-10% over the next 12-24 months. Scope would be obliterated and even more flying would be transferred to the regionals. Shrink to profitability would stir its ugly head again and even more flying would be transferred to the code-shares. Just look at how many flights BA has into CONUS vs AA to the UK. Something about that virtual airline that previous management wanted. Ever time their is supposed to be a pilot shortage, something happens and there is no longer one. Hope for the best but plan for the worst. |
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 2409510)
DL 2015(?) civilian avg was 7600 TT and 4100 PIC.
That's the median guy. That's what I'd be shooting for. The average from Jan 2014 to May 2015 was 7293TT and 3790 PIC.
Originally Posted by Thedude
(Post 2409523)
Really??
I was hearing that if you had more than 8k-10k TT you were overqualified ans considered un-trainable at DL. There's been pilots at DAL with 20K plus hired. |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2409209)
I still think some people don't grasp the number of retirements the next 10 years.
(Southwest, FedEx, and UPS are just a few years behind this with their own huge waves.) The next decade (11-20 years) will see another 40% retire as well (including a lot of the first hired from the regionals). This does not consider any growth. Some major external event can happen, it may cause a blip in the system, but the retirement freight train (sorry to mix my metaphors) is barreling down the track. Nothing is going to stop it. It is like having a 250 knot tailwind. |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 2409535)
I quite agree. In the next 10 years HALF of all the Legacy Carrier Airline pilots will retire. For American, a little MORE than HALF.
(Southwest, FedEx, and UPS are just a few years behind this with their own huge waves.) The next decade (11-20 years) will see another 40% retire as well (including a lot of the first hired from the regionals). This does not consider any growth. Some major external event can happen, it may cause a blip in the system, but the retirement freight train (sorry to mix my metaphors) is barreling down the track. Nothing is going to stop it. It is like having a 250 knot tailwind. |
even if age 67 happens all its going to do is slightly delay things, wont change the end result.
|
Originally Posted by Thedude
(Post 2409523)
Really??
I was hearing that if you had more than 8k-10k TT you were overqualified ans considered un-trainable at DL. |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2408978)
So the airlines are just going to massively shrink?
9/11 was only over three airliners striking the US and it took a trillion dollars off the world economy. Now multiply that by a 100 times. GF |
Greetings fellow aviators,
If anyone currenly at AA can answer this for me it would help me greatly. I am currently working at one of the big ME3 as a WB FO. I would like to return to the US with the wife & kids. I am currently sitting at 7600 TT, A320/ A330 TR, 4 yr deg, former US Marine, Pic 1200 hrs (all GA time during my CFI days), no Jet Pic, International experience. Will AA even take a look at me or would it be better if I go to a regional & get Jet Pic time first? Any advice will be appreciated. Getting tired of the ME. Need to return back. Thank you guys. Regards Jet |
Originally Posted by Jetflight77
(Post 2410226)
Greetings fellow aviators,
If anyone currenly at AA can answer this for me it would help me greatly. I am currently working at one of the big ME3 as a WB FO. I would like to return to the US with the wife & kids. I am currently sitting at 7600 TT, A320/ A330 TR, 4 yr deg, former US Marine, Pic 1200 hrs (all GA time during my CFI days), no Jet Pic, International experience. Will AA even take a look at me or would it be better if I go to a regional & get Jet Pic time first? Any advice will be appreciated. Getting tired of the ME. Need to return back. Thank you guys. Regards Jet |
If he goes to a WO it may limit his chance of getting hired off the street at AA
|
What are his odds of getting hired on his current career path? Looking at class resumes posted here or mentioned privately, or looking at the 'who's got hired' thread and how many FO's, or ME 3 FO's, especially with no US PIC time, are getting hired at AA? The answer is very little or perhaps none. And the few FO's that have gotten hired often have connections that were appear to have been a big factor in their getting pulled by the computer.
This is a basic opinion - look at the resumes of guys getting hired and ask yourself - do I compare? If yes continue on your current path. If you don't compare does your current path get you to a competitive resume? If yes continue what you're doing. If no change your path. Is the OP going to upgrade in 1-2 years? Staying might help. If no upgrade is in sight with 1000 hrs 121 (currently at zero??) he might be able to upgrade by moving back. Or the regional upgrade might come within the next three years. After two to three yrs as a regional captain he will be a median guy, or better, in all aspects. Here's another comment about anyone's current resume, if your current resume isn't gaining much traction will X years doing more of the same thing make you more competitive? Or are there other options that allow you to broaden your experience? The perfect example is how many military guys believe getting a regional job triggered a call from a major airline? Former military pilots have literally received one, two, or three contacts after getting a 121 regional job. Were they going to get called anyway? Probably. But does the simple fact of checking 121, a new type rating, new jeopardy event, civilian experience, light up the hiring computer's motherboard?? The answer for some, or perhaps many, appears to be yes. That also might apply to civilians. A common recommendation by the muckity mucks in hiring is "chase the job." Some candidates really do while some appear to be waiting for the job to find them. Another recommendation is "be better than your peers." It's possible that the computer seeks that out. Read posts by guys who've been hired at a major or a regional. You learn different things in a new job. Many mention that. If there's opportunities out there to improve your resume or experience, that aren't a step backwards or a dead end option, I think consideration should be given to challenging yourself. Here's a question to ask - will my resume and personal knowledge base be better if I spend more time at my current job or if I get a different job? That takes some analysis of the future. Is a regional FO job a step backwards for the OP? Yes. But if it leads to a US based 121 upgrade? That depends upon his upgrade timeline at his ME3 job. I recommend written future resumes, based on a forward looking analysis, on an annual basis assuming you stayed or took a different job. Which job choice makes your resume look like the ones of the guys getting hired? The answer to the 'do I stay or do I go' question might become more obvious. And none of this has discussed the family dynamics or ex-pat fatigue. |
Originally Posted by Jetflight77
(Post 2410226)
Greetings fellow aviators,
If anyone currenly at AA can answer this for me it would help me greatly. I am currently working at one of the big ME3 as a WB FO. I would like to return to the US with the wife & kids. I am currently sitting at 7600 TT, A320/ A330 TR, 4 yr deg, former US Marine, Pic 1200 hrs (all GA time during my CFI days), no Jet Pic, International experience. Will AA even take a look at me or would it be better if I go to a regional & get Jet Pic time first? Any advice will be appreciated. Getting tired of the ME. Need to return back. Thank you guys. Regards Jet |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2410333)
If he goes to a WO it may limit his chance of getting hired off the street at AA
Getting hired hired OTS is extremely competitive for those with pure civilian flying backgrounds regardless. Going to an AA WO increases someones chances of making it to AA. |
Originally Posted by Jetflight77
(Post 2410226)
Greetings fellow aviators,
If anyone currenly at AA can answer this for me it would help me greatly. I am currently working at one of the big ME3 as a WB FO. I would like to return to the US with the wife & kids. I am currently sitting at 7600 TT, A320/ A330 TR, 4 yr deg, former US Marine, Pic 1200 hrs (all GA time during my CFI days), no Jet Pic, International experience. Will AA even take a look at me or would it be better if I go to a regional & get Jet Pic time first? Any advice will be appreciated. Getting tired of the ME. Need to return back. Thank you guys. Regards Jet |
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2410333)
If he goes to a WO it may limit his chance of getting hired off the street at AA
|
Originally Posted by Machwon
(Post 2410586)
The last new hire class had 16 ots. With only one of those 16 being civilian. Wanna take a guess where he came from? Envoy.. jumped ahead of his flow by about 10 months.
|
Originally Posted by FlyingOkra
(Post 2410584)
With all of the Flows to AA taking up spots, I'd say that your chances are better of getting hired at Delta or United.
|
Originally Posted by flysooner9
(Post 2410333)
If he goes to a WO it may limit his chance of getting hired off the street at AA
|
Originally Posted by Da Magic
(Post 2411318)
Totally untrue. WO pilots are getting to the interview and beyond. Most WO pilots don't fill out the app completely cuz they have this mentality.
|
Originally Posted by foumanchu
(Post 2411524)
How many pilots have gotten hired outside of the flow? Was there anything unique about them? Have contacts within? Military? I think if you look at the very small amount of people who got hired out of seniority order, they had one of these going for them. And if they did, they would probably also have a good shot of getting hired off the street. If you do not have something like that going for you, getting hired outside of the flow seems like a long shot.
Of course they have something going on for them! These people aren't just bumps on a log with 8,000 TT, they are also attractive to DL UA etc. If a WO pilot just wants to "wait" their turn, by all means go ahead. But if that same pilot volunteers, becomes CKA, sim instructor, Chief Pilot, union work, or whatever, it will make their app better and chances of interview much stronger. |
'Jumping the list' is tough. But the three guys I've met who've done it stand out amongst their peers.
|
Originally Posted by Sliceback
(Post 2411668)
'Jumping the list' is tough. But the three guys I've met who've done it stand out amongst their peers.
|
I wanted to rekindle this thread. I have about 600hrs 121 time from trans states before they went under but I'm considering going to a fractional rather than skywest to build time to get to a major. Good idea? Bad idea? Thoughts?
|
Originally Posted by tygu2701
(Post 3272537)
I wanted to rekindle this thread. I have about 600hrs 121 time from trans states before they went under but I'm considering going to a fractional rather than skywest to build time to get to a major. Good idea? Bad idea? Thoughts?
Regionals in the recent years have had a steady stream of people leaving, creating opportunities internally. If the fractional you’re considering is going to have opportunities like that, then it probably doesn’t matter that much that it’s not part 121. If you’re looking at an outfit with a bunch of lifers and no growth, probably want to look elsewhere. |
Originally Posted by tygu2701
(Post 3272537)
I wanted to rekindle this thread. I have about 600hrs 121 time from trans states before they went under but I'm considering going to a fractional rather than skywest to build time to get to a major. Good idea? Bad idea? Thoughts?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:10 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands