Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   American (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/)
-   -   Avg Calendar Day, LOS approved (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/american/110007-avg-calendar-day-los-approved.html)

aa73 01-17-2018 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by jcountry (Post 2505292)
Dude.

If you think these are QOL increases, your thought processes are very seriously ****ed up. This thing des absolutely nothing good for QOL.

Is that so... let’s see, with 5:15 ACD we are going to be home more and yet earn more pay on trips that previously paid less. I’d call that a pretty big QOL gain... so does every other airline pilot that has it. Who’s ****ed Up here?

EMBFlyer 01-17-2018 05:42 PM


Originally Posted by aa73 (Post 2505271)
Disagree. A lot of fuss over stuff that’s barely going to change. This is the result of a lot of misinformation and fear spread (mostly) by the Clt and Phl reps.

The 5:15 ACD not being implemented is not at all a function of the monetary penalty, but rather the ramifications of what happens if they don’t: the operation will fall apart when APA pulls another September to remember. And they do NOT want to go down that road. For such a big QOL item to not be implemented will have severe consequences, and they know it. That is also a baseless fear.

To quote somebody from c&r who said it best:

“The LOS guys will be restored. Junior guys wont have to endure slash trips. Domestic guys will work fewer days. Scheduling practices will remain the same. But guys will continue to *****. Cause thats what they do......”

Effectively, We just gained huge QOL increases outside of S6. And no the sky is not falling.

Agreed!

I started hear more and more compelling reasons why this was a good thing, with evidence to back them up (AW and DS podcasts) and yet the CLT/PHL was the same thing just repeated at a higher volume.

It was obvious to me that the theory of "Whoever Is The Loudest Is The Most Correct" was well in play on that call as ES, BF and PD kept blasting my ear drums.

mainlineAF 01-17-2018 05:48 PM


Originally Posted by jcountry (Post 2505292)
Dude.

If you think these are QOL increases, your thought processes are very seriously ****ed up. This thing des absolutely nothing good for QOL.



ACD of 5:15 isn’t a QOL increase? Okkkkk. This is absolutely huge for QOL.

We had ~75 guys who were awarded 21 days of work a few months back. Now those guys will fly 16.

I know you hate APA but a win is a win.

jcountry 01-17-2018 05:48 PM


Originally Posted by aa73 (Post 2505308)
Is that so... let’s see, with 5:15 ACD we are going to be home more and yet earn more pay on trips that previously paid less. I’d call that a pretty big QOL gain... so does every other airline pilot that has it. Who’s ****ed Up here?

I hope it works out that way.

My concerns are with R.O. and the other scheduling provisions. That stuff is actually far worse. If the trip goes to hell, so will your off days.

Plus, the company is VERY creative in the way they avoid paying for any kind of soft time. I submit for you-all nighters. With this contract, those were supposed to pay well. When's the last time you actually saw any?

the company will just figure out some way to turn these damned things into crap 4 or 5 days, and when RO kicks in, we will be at min days off. Yeah. Super QOL improvements.

mainlineAF 01-17-2018 05:49 PM


Originally Posted by Saabs (Post 2505294)
To be fair you’re very isolated on the RJ. RO happens enough on the baby bus to warrant being worried about it.



The real issue is wtf is a DFP after an RO and why aren’t all days off equal? That’s what needs to be fixed.



Isolated? Nope I’m all over LGA, DCA and BOS.

PRS Guitars 01-17-2018 05:51 PM


Originally Posted by jcountry (Post 2505292)
Dude.

If you think these are QOL increases, your thought processes are very seriously ****ed up. This thing des absolutely nothing good for QOL.

I’ve been mainly against this deal and then back and forth a bit, but on balance, yes this will likely be an increase in QOL, by eliminating or at least paying a slash trip better. PHL and CLT reps started really reaching by claiming that ACD would be a bad thing. That’s where they lost credibility with me. I just don’t buy it. Then when they claimed the tax bonus would also be tied to LOS, that was a bridge too far for me. Those guys have some valid points but are crooked politicians at heart who will say anything to support their agenda (ends justify the means)...

And let’s not forget that yes LUS didn’t have RO, but...you were only pay protected for the last sequence of the month, so if any other sequence canceled, you got nothing. That was ridiculous.

jcountry 01-17-2018 05:59 PM


Originally Posted by PRS Guitars (Post 2505325)
I’ve been mainly against this deal and then back and forth a bit, but on balance, yes this will likely be an increase in QOL, by eliminating or at least paying a slash trip better. PHL and CLT reps started really reaching by claiming that ACD would be a bad thing. That’s where they lost credibility with me. I just don’t buy it. Then when they claimed the tax bonus would also be tied to LOS, that was a bridge too far for me. Those guys have some valid points but are crooked politicians at heart who will say anything to support their agenda (ends justify the means)...

And let’s not forget that yes LUS didn’t have RO, but...you were only pay protected for the last sequence of the month, so if any other sequence canceled, you got nothing. That was ridiculous.



Can't they just turn all slash trips into 4 days or 5 days?

I would MUCH rather fly 12 regular red eyes vs one of those God-awful 4 days which ends with a red eye. Those damned things are evil!

And will we actually get ACD? The penalty for non-implementation is far cheaper than the cost. And did the union get less than 30% float-so we won't have to wait a whole year (for it to not be implemented anyhow?)

This agreement is crap. A good negotiator would have walked away.

sumwherelse 01-17-2018 06:03 PM

Very true. Like I said we all are making gains. Some of those gains have come at some cost. But let’s hope that now we can start moving forward.

aa73 01-17-2018 06:07 PM


Originally Posted by jcountry (Post 2505320)
I hope it works out that way.

My concerns are with R.O. and the other scheduling provisions. That stuff is actually far worse. If the trip goes to hell, so will your off days.

Plus, the company is VERY creative in the way they avoid paying for any kind of soft time. I submit for you-all nighters. With this contract, those were supposed to pay well. When's the last time you actually saw any?

the company will just figure out some way to turn these damned things into crap 4 or 5 days, and when RO kicks in, we will be at min days off. Yeah. Super QOL improvements.

These are all your opinions and that’s fine, I respect them... but I think you are falling for a lot of the FUD spreading by the CLT and PHL reps.

Couple of things.

1) We’ve always had RO since the JCBA and very little of that will change, with the exception of it going to electorinic notifications (a plus, since it won’t allow them to interpret it how they see fit, it’ll go by the book)

2) Delta, United also have their own forms of RO. It is a legacy airline industry standard. You guys at LUS were lucky not to have any.

Bottom line, in my opinion.. we will have very little negative impact in exchange for A LOT of positive impact.

And two less big items to have to bargain for in S6 openers.

PRS Guitars 01-17-2018 06:14 PM


Originally Posted by jcountry (Post 2505331)

I would MUCH rather fly 12 regular red eyes vs one of those God-awful 4 days which ends with a red eye. Those damned things are evil!

And will we actually get ACD? The penalty for non-implementation is far cheaper than the cost. And did the union get less than 30% float-so we won't have to wait a whole year (for it to not be implemented anyhow)

To the former...one man’s trash is another man’s treasure. On reserve I love the “milk run” 1 out 1 back red eyes. As a line holder, I can’t stand them, because of the low pay. They are inefficient to a line holder. So yeah, a four day that ends at 0600 and pays 21+ hours...sign me up.

To the latter...I predict that they will implement it, I just don’t see much benefit to the company if the don’t. They gave us an 8% pay raise for nothing, why would they drag their feet after agreeing to this?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:31 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands