Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Future of the three WO's? >

Future of the three WO's?

Search
Notices

Future of the three WO's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2018, 08:25 AM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Lyft and Uber are dependent on an essentially inexhaustible reserve of drivers and cars that go unused 23 hours a day and can enter and exit the market near-instantaneously at near-zero cost. I don’t see any aviation parallels there.
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 05-09-2018, 09:48 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT View Post
I think the question for the next decade is pilot supply. If pilot labor costs double or triple over historical norms, what happens to the business model?
Yep we'll have more issues then the WO's. We retire over 650 pilots next year. The fact that number will go up each year and it seems we can only train about 650 a year is a much more of a problem to deal with.

I think eventually the WO'ed pilots will be frozen at there airlines however at the same time be given a seniority number. It will be interesting how this goes over in the next 4-5 years.
billyho is offline  
Old 05-09-2018, 02:00 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,097
Default

Well oil just crossed $70. Highs prices help some of our business (Midwest and south fracking areas now have more money) but hurt overall. So far revenue is not increasing along with costs.

So, it doesn't bode well.

Compare our latest quarterly numbers with SWA, they earned more and had 1/2 the airplanes in their fleet.

Unfortunately Doug has hitched our business model to the expensive CASM RJ.
Name User is offline  
Old 05-09-2018, 03:49 PM
  #14  
Hire me
 
UPTme's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 406
Default

Higher fuel costs help us against ULCC, as their fares rely on their low Ex fuel CASM. So, higher fuel prices hit them harder than they do us. We will be fine. Maybe Dougie will have to only buy back $1 billion in shares this year. Rough life.
UPTme is offline  
Old 05-10-2018, 10:17 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by UPTme View Post
Higher fuel costs help us against ULCC, as their fares rely on their low Ex fuel CASM. So, higher fuel prices hit them harder than they do us. We will be fine. Maybe Dougie will have to only buy back $1 billion in shares this year. Rough life.
First your comment doesn't make sense. Ex fuel CASM is CASM minus fuel (excluding). Their fares rely on total overall lower costs than competitors. Spirits ex CASM actually decreased last quarter and is forecast to continue dropping.

Their margins go up as we have to raise prices to cover fuel increases.
Name User is offline  
Old 05-10-2018, 10:29 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Default

Originally Posted by jcountry View Post
Not as I see it.

That would require a whole different generation of aircraft.

Also, almost all the gains in safety made since the concept of CRM since the early 80s are attributable to two pilots being present and actively participating. I don’t think any datalink technology will allow that for quite some time.

Single pilot probably seems like a good idea to idiot politicians and uppper mgmt. It seems like an awful idea to those of us who see how often small problems are fixed using CRM-before they can become big problems.

I also think the subject of datalink is a very misunderstood subject. A very high grade avionics suite would be required-and it would have to be absolutely bulletproof.

That link would be the biggest, juiciest target ever for hackers.
Anything that was even near to needing a good connection is still a challenge. We have pretty good GPS, but that is one way and we must have at least five signals. How many times does your wifi/cell/sat lose connection?
pitchattitude is offline  
Old 05-10-2018, 01:04 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Position: Violin on the Envoy-tanic
Posts: 175
Default

I’m not nearly as worried about oil prices this time around. The U.S. is probably going to become the biggest producer and exporter of crude this year according to forecasts, and there are a ton of fracking wells and operations that were bought up by investors when the price dropped, just waiting for the time to be right to start pumping again. OPEC screwed themselves by keeping the price so high for so long, and now we have the excess capacity in reserve. The biggest issue is going to be the labor shortage of pilots. (#WKTWH Mr. Glass, and told you as much in bankruptcy.) The zero to hero program started by AAG is an indicator that they are finally admitting the size of the problem. It takes several years to train someone and get them their hours now. Although they will try to hold on to the cheaper labor regional model for as long as possible, sooner or later either they will be forced to place a large group one order at mainline (or transfer 175’s to mainline), or they will need to make the WO regionals the ONLY way to get to AA if they want their regional feed staffed. Merging in the WO’ed airlines to AA would only be their final, last option if everything else they tried had failed. They simply don’t want to give up the pay differences among all the work groups, and lose their whipsawing ability.
TrinityDawn is offline  
Old 05-10-2018, 08:05 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Question

What the hell does "whipsawing" mean?
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 05-11-2018, 02:53 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Divide and conquer. Pit Envoy/Piedmont/PSA against each other fighting to please Mainline rather than allowing them to join forces to bargain as a single, powerful entity.
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 05-11-2018, 06:39 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iHateAMR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Position: FO
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT View Post
Divide and conquer. Pit Envoy/Piedmont/PSA against each other fighting to please Mainline rather than allowing them to join forces to bargain as a single, powerful entity.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Envoy_Air

Though I hate quoting Wikipedia, know your history, or maybe you do and I missed the joke!
iHateAMR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
par8head
Money Talk
31
12-23-2015 03:03 AM
warriordriver
Regional
36
07-10-2014 04:39 PM
FloridaGator
Hangar Talk
26
10-02-2008 10:24 AM
flyharm
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
09-11-2008 05:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices