![]() |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 2830097)
Most guys have your opinion. They don't care about AA's profitability at all and their efforts at work show it. And they wonder why we aren't paid as well as Delta or United, or even SWA.
I don't care what I fly. If long haul loses money I want our JV partners to lose the money, not us. Wanting to fly big airplanes is just a form of SJS. The more money the company makes the more we can be paid. If the company doesn't make money, over a long enough time period, we will cease to get paid at all. A lot of JV stuff is compromise. The other countries want their share of the flying as well. We have a high cost structure and a cheap product. Delta and United are building true global networks and are able to command a revenue premium with the business travelers for a superior product. Meanwhile, Parker AA is busy announcing seasonal E175 service to random hamlets with no competition. Our results speak to the effectiveness of our business plan. You work harder to make less money than your same seniority counter part at Delta or United. This thread is about "time to WB CA". If enough people share your views on the importance of maintaining those jobs then time to WB CA will probably be more like 20+ years to never. |
I predict in the next downturn AA will be first to fail, dragging others down. Labor cost are to high, chap 11 needs to happen.
|
Originally Posted by cactusmike
(Post 2830152)
Nonrevs get bumped for cargo. It’s an issue at United as well.
I think the rumor was SYD back to the 777. |
Originally Posted by WhenPigsFLy
(Post 2830166)
I predict in the next downturn AA will be first to fail, dragging others down. Labor cost are to high, chap 11 needs to happen.
Ch 11 is not going to happen. It's ridiculous to even mention. $3 Billion profit even with an operation in shambles and people are talking bankruptcy. I think the pilots that went through the post 9/11 lost decade are similar to the generation that went through the Great Depression, always waiting for it to happen again next year..... |
Originally Posted by WhenPigsFLy
(Post 2830166)
I predict in the next downturn AA will be first to fail, dragging others down. Labor cost are to high, chap 11 needs to happen.
|
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 2830162)
Nearly half of Delta's revenue is from international ops. Nearly half of United's revenue is from International ops. AAL's percentage is 27%. Half of our major competitors. We are the largest airline in the world with a relatively small international footprint. Our profit margins are a fraction of United and Delta. Do you think those facts might be related?
We have a high cost structure and a cheap product. Delta and United are building true global networks and are able to command a revenue premium with the business travelers for a superior product. Meanwhile, Parker AA is busy announcing seasonal E175 service to random hamlets with no competition. Our results speak to the effectiveness of our business plan. You work harder to make less money than your same seniority counter part at Delta or United. This thread is about "time to WB CA". If enough people share your views on the importance of maintaining those jobs then time to WB CA will probably be more like 20+ years to never. |
Originally Posted by m78fl370
(Post 2830270)
Very well said. It’s painful to watch Parker and his crew run this place like a domestic LCC. We will NEVER compete with Delta and United like this.
|
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 2830168)
...
Ch 11 is not going to happen. It's ridiculous to even mention. $3 Billion profit even with an operation in shambles and people are talking bankruptcy. I think the pilots that went through the post 9/11 lost decade are similar to the generation that went through the Great Depression, always waiting for it to happen again next year..... |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 2830162)
Nearly half of Delta's revenue is from international ops. Nearly half of United's revenue is from International ops. AAL's percentage is 27%. Half of our major competitors. We are the largest airline in the world with a relatively small international footprint. Our profit margins are a fraction of United and Delta. Do you think those facts might be related?
We have a high cost structure and a cheap product. Delta and United are building true global networks and are able to command a revenue premium with the business travelers for a superior product. Meanwhile, Parker AA is busy announcing seasonal E175 service to random hamlets with no competition. Our results speak to the effectiveness of our business plan. So Vasu/company uses government data such as that to pick routes and develop them. Some there isn't much data on, and a risk is taken. I think AA's largest problem is branding in that we don't have one, we are just a generic transportation company. Nothing really sets us apart. Also I feel the "American" name hurts us overseas as well. Parker's idea was to not be a Walmart but a Target, basically a step above the lowest common denominator. Both Delta and United have a higher overall CASM than us but of course make up for that with higher revenue as well. My wife is a typical business traveler both domestic and international. By far her main priority in booking flights is schedule and seat available. Anything else is simply icing on the cake. East coast to west coast delta has better scheduling of flights. She won't even look at United. She does fly on AA when I can convince her to (rarely!). You work harder to make less money than your same seniority counter part at Delta or United. This thread is about "time to WB CA". If enough people share your views on the importance of maintaining those jobs then time to WB CA will probably be more like 20+ years to never. |
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 2830321)
But but but what happened to the class- y / ic KDA statement?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands