![]() |
Originally Posted by Arado 234
(Post 3254014)
I am curious, is there anybody out here that does not have redder trips for July? I can't trade anything.
CA 320 LGA. |
Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
(Post 3254399)
N4TL? What’s that for those of us not proficient in DECS?
|
Originally Posted by PRS Guitars
(Post 3254400)
I have five green trips…but they are all one day trips…crappy one day trips but they pay 6:30 or better. First green trips I’ve seen in a long time. First time flying 1 days too. YMMV
|
Originally Posted by Kebert Xela
(Post 3253892)
I didn’t nor do I claim to have any info or insight then or now. However, did United with the largest exposure to international and wide body fleet furlough? Delta with their JV’s going bankrupt and losing big on them furlough?
Did they threaten furloughs, absolutely. Did they have management saying that furloughs was the absolute wrong decision and they wouldn’t do it so they could take market share and be prepared for a recovery? Not to my knowledge. If they did, well they didn’t furlough and get caught with their pants down much like AA. If AA sends a message they better live by it. Right now WE’RE dying by it and expected to do more because of their ineptness. Asking work groups to volunteer to work for free because they screwed up, give me a break. They don’t care about us and have proven they can’t handle running a company. We made less money than competitors during the good times! It’s just embarrassing now. Vasu’s department isn’t obligated to concern themselves with overhead. Interchanging “the company” with revenue mgmt department oversimplifies the difference between revenue and profit. Saying they shouldn’t have furloughed is either just a desire, Monday morning quarter back, or saying they should have known exactly when this thing would be over. Right now its good info, they have booked more work than what the pilot group can handle, maybe even with the furloughs back. |
Originally Posted by flyinawa
(Post 3254156)
Oooooh, the old “if you don’t know, I’m not gonna explain it to you” reply. Well played, sir. WELL played.
It was an honest question. You wanna shoot arrows? At least provide some explanation. |
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 3254491)
Vasu is a revenue guy, it stands to reason more pilots and planes always generate more revenue than fewer pilot and planes.
Vasu’s department isn’t obligated to concern themselves with overhead. Interchanging “the company” with revenue mgmt department oversimplifies the difference between revenue and profit. Saying they shouldn’t have furloughed is either just a desire, Monday morning quarter back, or saying they should have known exactly when this thing would be over. Right now its good info, they have booked more work than what the pilot group can handle, maybe even with the furloughs back. Do you think that Vasu and his team operate in a vacuum? More pilots and more planes means more revenue, so you think they will always argue to grow the company even when it doesn’t make sense to do so? Extremely myopic viewpoints are acceptable just because of what someone’s job title is? Why did DAL and UAL not furlough, while we did? Almost seems like they were smart enough to see the potential in a recovery to me. You can defend it all until the cows come home, doesn’t change the fact that we took a different course than everyone else and are paying the price for it. Enraging passengers is not good for business, and neither is making the news for cancelling flights due to staffing after begging for government assistance to keep staff on property. How is that something anyone can argue about? |
Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
(Post 3254265)
N4TL blank. As it was for every trip in June as well. Place is a joke.
|
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3254502)
Even if you give the company a pass just because his title is chief revenue officer, why did we generate less revenue despite flying more than DAL and UAL prior to the pandemic? I bet the same is true for after the pandemic. What’s the excuse there?
Do you think that Vasu and his team operate in a vacuum? More pilots and more planes means more revenue, so you think they will always argue to grow the company even when it doesn’t make sense to do so? Extremely myopic viewpoints are acceptable just because of what someone’s job title is? Why did DAL and UAL not furlough, while we did? Almost seems like they were smart enough to see the potential in a recovery to me. You can defend it all until the cows come home, doesn’t change the fact that we took a different course than everyone else and are paying the price for it. Enraging passengers is not good for business, and neither is making the news for cancelling flights due to staffing after begging for government assistance to keep staff on property. How is that something anyone can argue about? |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3254502)
Even if you give the company a pass just because his title is chief revenue officer, why did we generate less revenue despite flying more than DAL and UAL prior to the pandemic? I bet the same is true for after the pandemic. What’s the excuse there?
Do you think that Vasu and his team operate in a vacuum? More pilots and more planes means more revenue, so you think they will always argue to grow the company even when it doesn’t make sense to do so? Extremely myopic viewpoints are acceptable just because of what someone’s job title is? Why did DAL and UAL not furlough, while we did? Almost seems like they were smart enough to see the potential in a recovery to me. You can defend it all until the cows come home, doesn’t change the fact that we took a different course than everyone else and are paying the price for it. Enraging passengers is not good for business, and neither is making the news for cancelling flights due to staffing after begging for government assistance to keep staff on property. How is that something anyone can argue about? Delta was 47B AA was 45B United was 43B My take was the Max was down, the mechanics were doing their work slow down, and they were retiring the MD-80s, and Delta has JV revenue that is larger than AA’s. Delta did furlough, I believe over 1,000 received no award on a displacement notice; their union negotiated 35 hours at 717 FO pay. The cares act bumped them up to full time pay. They were not qualified on any Delta equipment. Vasu doesn’t operate in a vacuum, CASM includes the relevant cost for him to use. His department doesn’t produce a ROI for furloughs for the various labor groups. If anything the APA is responsible for ensuring that furloughs are costly tilting any ROI spreadsheet in their favor. IF United didn’t furlough its because their contract, ratio of domestic/international titled the ROI of a furlough in the pilots favor. Has little bearing on Kirby's foresight vs Parker on when this would end. AA parked 4 fleet types, and claims they knocked 1B in overhead off of 2019 volume. I don’t have any numbers yet but I believe the June cancels are due to AA scheduling more block hours than Delta or United. I highly doubt Delta or United could park 4 fleets and only suffer 3% capacity for 30-60 days. I think both company’s are internally upset they didn’t schedule more blocks hours for June, and have already started “missing out”. |
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 3255214)
2019 revenue
Delta was 47B AA was 45B United was 43B My take was the Max was down, the mechanics were doing their work slow down, and they were retiring the MD-80s, and Delta has JV revenue that is larger than AA’s. Delta did furlough, I believe over 1,000 received no award on a displacement notice; their union negotiated 35 hours at 717 FO pay. The cares act bumped them up to full time pay. They were not qualified on any Delta equipment. Vasu doesn’t operate in a vacuum, CASM includes the relevant cost for him to use. His department doesn’t produce a ROI for furloughs for the various labor groups. If anything the APA is responsible for ensuring that furloughs are costly tilting any ROI spreadsheet in their favor. IF United didn’t furlough its because their contract, ratio of domestic/international titled the ROI of a furlough in the pilots favor. Has little bearing on Kirby's foresight vs Parker on when this would end. AA parked 4 fleet types, and claims they knocked 1B in overhead off of 2019 volume. I don’t have any numbers yet but I believe the June cancels are due to AA scheduling more block hours than Delta or United. I highly doubt Delta or United could park 4 fleets and only suffer 3% capacity for 30-60 days. But delta did not furlough. 35 hours of pay while not working is most certainly not a furlough. |
Originally Posted by brockenspectre
(Post 3254501)
I did provide an explanation, down to the most simple form. My comment obviously rubbed you the wrong way, so you are obviously cognizant that what I said holds water.
|
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 3255214)
2019 revenue
Delta was 47B AA was 45B United was 43B My take was the Max was down, the mechanics were doing their work slow down, and they were retiring the MD-80s, and Delta has JV revenue that is larger than AA’s. Delta did furlough, I believe over 1,000 received no award on a displacement notice; their union negotiated 35 hours at 717 FO pay. The cares act bumped them up to full time pay. They were not qualified on any Delta equipment. Vasu doesn’t operate in a vacuum, CASM includes the relevant cost for him to use. His department doesn’t produce a ROI for furloughs for the various labor groups. If anything the APA is responsible for ensuring that furloughs are costly tilting any ROI spreadsheet in their favor. IF United didn’t furlough its because their contract, ratio of domestic/international titled the ROI of a furlough in the pilots favor. Has little bearing on Kirby's foresight vs Parker on when this would end. AA parked 4 fleet types, and claims they knocked 1B in overhead off of 2019 volume. I don’t have any numbers yet but I believe the June cancels are due to AA scheduling more block hours than Delta or United. I highly doubt Delta or United could park 4 fleets and only suffer 3% capacity for 30-60 days. I think both company’s are internally upset they didn’t schedule more blocks hours for June, and have already started “missing out”. |
Originally Posted by flyinawa
(Post 3255229)
Go back and sit at the kid’s table.
|
AA parked 5 of 9 fleet types.
MD80 (parked shortly before COVID-19) E190 B757 B767 A330 These amounted to about 10% of the fleet. In all the COVID-19 impacts, the fleet simplification to two narrow body and two wide body series is often missed. Standardization of parts, mechanics training, and pilot training should not be underestimated to the operations or the bottom line. This will be a positive impact long after COVID-19 is just a faint memory. |
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tedreed...h=1176de8e4b80
According to the spokesperson quoted in the article, they will be done with training all recalled pilots by the end of June. So what’s happening between July and October, which is when they said they’ll start classes for people with CJOs? Maybe classes will start sooner? |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3255468)
AA parked 5 of 9 fleet types.
MD80 (parked shortly before COVID-19) E190 B757 B767 A330 These amounted to about 10% of the fleet. In all the COVID-19 impacts, the fleet simplification to two narrow body and two wide body series is often missed. Standardization of parts, mechanics training, and pilot training should not be underestimated to the operations or the bottom line. This will be a positive impact long after COVID-19 is just a faint memory. With a management team that focuses on operational integrity, AA has the tools to succeed. With a management team that spends all their time focusing on woke emails and endeavors, plus cutting resources like gate agents per flight, no amount of efficiency can help. |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3255509)
I agree that this should lead to an operational simplification and efficiency. I’m not sure however that this particular management team has what it takes. Even with these simplifications, we’re cancelling hundreds of flights, some of which are due to maintenance and weather events. (IROPS recovery and maintenance should’ve been helped by the streamlining).
With a management team that focuses on operational integrity, AA has the tools to succeed. With a management team that spends all their time focusing on woke emails and endeavors, plus cutting resources like gate agents per flight, no amount of efficiency can help. I do care about the fact that they make awful operational decisions on a consistent basis, and we pay a price for it. |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3255521)
Every airline does what you guys complain about. It’s a Facebook profile picture logo, or Instagram, or an email. Why do you guys let it bother you? It’s not the cause of the massive issues at this airline, or even a factor. Its literally a non factor. I bet those emails are written by people you’ve never heard of, sent on doug or chip’s account. They also sent emails praising the last president and his administration. Whatever!
I do care about the fact that they make awful operational decisions on a consistent basis, and we pay a price for it. I tell you one thing, if we ran a great operation and our customer satisfaction surveys were at an all times high, I wouldn’t care about these woke activities. However seeing what’s happening around here, and how management chooses to run the operation, Well they’re spending their energy in all the wrong areas. Take care of the Airline. |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3255531)
I disagree. I think its valuable time and resources being taken away from what should be front and center everyday, the operation. Time we as employees spend on these distance learning modules and in person classes could be oriented around customer service (FAs, gate agents etc) and other operational priorities.
I tell you one thing, if we ran a great operation and our customer satisfaction surveys were at an all times high, I wouldn’t care about these woke activities. However seeing what’s happening around here, and how management chooses to run the operation, Well they’re spending their energy in all the wrong areas. Take care of the Airline. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.was...outputType=amp |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3255219)
Its clear that the path this company is on is satisfactory for you, and that’s okay. We’ll leave it as a simple disagreement on that.
But delta did not furlough. 35 hours of pay while not working is most certainly not a furlough. I guess we have already taken for granite that the Cares3 money runs out in September and there will be enough work to keep things going without Cares4. I am not drinking the KoolAid and Doug has gotten complacent over the last 5 years. He’s capable of leading this company just like the gate agents are capable of being nice and polite. |
What nobody has mentioned yet is the competitive angle of just getting the job versus getting to the highest-paying level of the job.
Someone coming out of school with an engineering or medical degree can get their first job quite easily, but they must spend their whole career working harder than everyone else if they want to be promoted to the highest paid levels of their chosen field. There will be competition for EVERY raise and promotion. You might be great friends with the ten other guys you were hired with, but only one of you will get the manager position. You can never take a break because with that increased pay comes the expectation of increased value. They got that job real easy in their twenties, but they are still grinding into their forties and fifties because the new kids coming out of college have no families or hobbies and they are ready to work harder and for way less money. When the company needs to shed some payroll, it’s the senior guys in the crosshairs. They better hope all that extra effort is still valuable to the folks in HR, otherwise that big paycheck is low hanging fruit in a downturn. At the airlines, you have to be more competitive than all the other guys exactly once... on interview day. From that point out, your seniority number is yours. Your base, equipment, and seat are whatever you can hold. You don’t need to schmooze the boss or get extra Masters Degrees or work weekends to get the next promotion. As long as the company doesn’t fold in a downturn, you can count the pilots below you on the list and know if you’re getting the axe. You don’t need to work on your days off or throw your coworkers under the bus to survive job cuts. At the airlines, you don’t need to achieve more than the ten guys you were hired with. You all upgrade together (if you want). I like not having to weasel and sweat my way to job security; I’ve been there and that’s way too much stress. But place whatever value you want on that life stress. |
Originally Posted by Happyflyer
(Post 3255569)
I was just commenting on the flight cancelation news cycle. Canceling for too much work, is better than not having enough work.
I guess we have already taken for granite that the Cares3 money runs out in September and there will be enough work to keep things going without Cares4. I am not drinking the KoolAid and Doug has gotten complacent over the last 5 years. He’s capable of leading this company just like the gate agents are capable of being nice and polite. Yes, almost all airlines overbook. AA seems to be the worst for it. |
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 3260219)
except one fairly valuable point that you’re missing. You just ****ed off a bunch of passengers for cancelling that will probably avoid flying AA again.
Yes, almost all airlines overbook. AA seems to be the worst for it. |
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 3260219)
except one fairly valuable point that you’re missing. You just ****ed off a bunch of passengers for cancelling that will probably avoid flying AA again.
Yes, almost all airlines overbook. AA seems to be the worst for it. |
Originally Posted by havick206
(Post 3260219)
except one fairly valuable point that you’re missing. You just ****ed off a bunch of passengers for cancelling that will probably avoid flying AA again.
Yes, almost all airlines overbook. AA seems to be the worst for it. |
Originally Posted by sanicom3205
(Post 3260226)
It all comes down to the fact that they run this place based off nothing but numbers. “We can save x million a year by only having one agent per flight!”. They never ask themselves if it actually makes sense, but it looks good on paper. They’d “metric” themself out of business if they could.
|
Originally Posted by thrust
(Post 3260253)
Apparently UAL and DAL have had one gate agent for years. Not excusing AAL management’s incompetence, nor necessarily disagreeing with you, just saying there is a precedent. The root cause of AAL’s issues is entirely on incompetent management. New management would turn things around quickly- just look at UAL pre and post-Smisek, NW/DAL pre and post-Anderson, etc.
|
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3260233)
yes they’ll book away to SWA who has been cancelling twice as many flights as AA for over a week now.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sout...ry?id=78629900 |
Originally Posted by Thrust Hold
(Post 3260504)
|
Originally Posted by thrust
(Post 3260253)
Apparently UAL and DAL have had one gate agent for years. Not excusing AAL management’s incompetence, nor necessarily disagreeing with you, just saying there is a precedent. The root cause of AAL’s issues is entirely on incompetent management. New management would turn things around quickly- just look at UAL pre and post-Smisek, NW/DAL pre and post-Anderson, etc.
Just like you say. UAL sucked before, so did Delta. New management changed that quick. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3261907)
Makes a difference if the one agent wasn't a legacy US/AA hAAte agent.
Just like you say. UAL sucked before, so did Delta. New management changed that quick. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3261907)
Makes a difference if the one agent wasn't a legacy US/AA hAAte agent.
Just like you say. UAL sucked before, so did Delta. New management changed that quick. |
Originally Posted by nAAtive
(Post 3261944)
Middle management at AA is predominantly still legacy AA. They are the backbone of the suckiness. Clipboards and vests? Yup
|
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 3262508)
Its everywhere. Back in the day, Delta had “APU Sherriffs” who were retired guys who just had to find something else to do, so they’d confront crews on APU usage.
|
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 3262508)
Its everywhere. Back in the day, Delta had “APU Sherriffs” who were retired guys who just had to find something else to do, so they’d confront crews on APU usage.
|
Seems like we’re canceling a huge number of flights yesterday and today. Anyone have the skinny on what’s going on? And god I really hope the answer isn’t simply a thunderstorm in DFW. 500+ flights canceled yesterday. Working on close to the same today.
|
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3273001)
Seems like we’re canceling a huge number of flights yesterday and today. Anyone have the skinny on what’s going on? And god I really hope the answer isn’t simply a thunderstorm in DFW. 500+ flights canceled yesterday. Working on close to the same today.
|
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3273001)
Seems like we’re canceling a huge number of flights yesterday and today. Anyone have the skinny on what’s going on? And god I really hope the answer isn’t simply a thunderstorm in DFW. 500+ flights canceled yesterday. Working on close to the same today.
Management is running the pilot and FA schedules pretty tight at AA. Building schedules with duty hours and block hours right up against the limits. With any sort of delay, the crews time out. This is 100% the "cost savings" attempts by AA management that are failing miserably. It might look good on paper, but it isn't going to work in the real world. |
Short on rampers, gate agents, crew meals, hotel rooms, FAs, pilots, etc. Throw some weather in the mix and the operation implodes.
Wasn't it just a few weeks ago that Parker laid out the goal of running the best operation ever this summer? |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3273548)
Short on rampers, gate agents, crew meals, hotel rooms, FAs, pilots, etc. Throw some weather in the mix and the operation implodes.
Wasn't it just a few weeks ago that Parker laid out the goal of running the best operation ever this summer? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:20 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands