Search
Notices

AA Check Airman Pay?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2022, 04:47 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrust's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,133
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso View Post
I really don’t understand why anyone would want to take that job currently. And I’m not even talking about the leverage angle either. It’s a tough job with a lot of workdays and I think 92 hours per month? You could make way more and work less (easier work too, not teaching) as a regular line line pilot. I don’t get the allure.

Maybe local DFW folks getting to spend every other month in the sim not flying could make sense, but many commute to DFW for that. Doesn’t make sense to me. I guess the name tag really has some magic powers. Makes you feel special.
I can understand the appeal for those who are super junior otherwise and commuting from a middle of nowhere/tough location. The positive space travel could be attractive. Some people just have to be the guy in charge, some people just have to “teach”, some love the sim, some love the supposed ego boost, some view it as ladder climbing towards management jobs. Not all, but some.

But for most, it just isn’t a good deal in its current form. It just isn’t. And, per a certain chief pilot, the company has had to significantly reduce its screening in its desperation to replace the mass exodus. That’s scary. Incompetent AA mgmt is concerned, but not THAT concerned…yet.
thrust is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 05:03 PM
  #22  
Weekend workaholic
 
flyinawa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 669
Default

Originally Posted by LBFO79 View Post
it is not that hard to do. All you need is a list of CKA before and after. VERY EASY. I will not be doing training with any of them, I promise you that.
ROFL! Seriously? Oh the HUMANITY! How will they be able to sleep knowing you won’t allow them to help you fumble your way though CQT? Activate the suicide watch!
flyinawa is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 05:06 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

Originally Posted by thrust View Post
But for most, it just isn’t a good deal in its current form. It just isn’t. And, per a certain chief pilot, the company has had to significantly reduce its screening in its desperation to replace the mass exodus. That’s scary. Incompetent AA mgmt is concerned, but not THAT concerned…yet.
Yeah, that's gonna really suck. Training has always been an enjoyable experience for me - I worry we're letting all the wrong folks into the schoolhouse.
biigD is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 05:11 PM
  #24  
Weekend workaholic
 
flyinawa's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 669
Default

Originally Posted by biigD View Post
Yeah, that's gonna really suck. Training has always been an enjoyable experience for me - I worry we're letting all the wrong folks into the schoolhouse.
If you work with a CKA that sucks.. give the company feedback. End of story. It doesn’t matter if they’ve been there for 6 months or 16 years… if someone is terrible, tell the company they’re terrible and when they get a few similar reports, they get yanked.
flyinawa is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 05:42 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by flyinawa View Post
If you work with a CKA that sucks.. give the company feedback. End of story. It doesn’t matter if they’ve been there for 6 months or 16 years… if someone is terrible, tell the company they’re terrible and when they get a few similar reports, they get yanked.
Absolutely
R57 relay is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 05:45 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by El Peso View Post
I really don’t understand why anyone would want to take that job currently. And I’m not even talking about the leverage angle either. It’s a tough job with a lot of workdays and I think 92 hours per month? You could make way more and work less (easier work too, not teaching) as a regular line line pilot. I don’t get the allure.

Maybe local DFW folks getting to spend every other month in the sim not flying could make sense, but many commute to DFW for that. Doesn’t make sense to me. I guess the name tag really has some magic powers. Makes you feel special.
So you don't understand why someone would do it, so you throw out BS about the name tag
R57 relay is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 05:48 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

You guys think they're gonna yank a crappy check airman in this environment?
biigD is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 05:54 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Default

Originally Posted by biigD View Post
You guys think they're gonna yank a crappy check airman in this environment?
I know they have.
R57 relay is offline  
Old 05-20-2022, 06:05 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,734
Default

Originally Posted by R57 relay View Post
I know they have.
Okay. I'm happy to be wrong about it, but getting cold called to apply back in the fall made me think they're not nearly as concerned about quality as they used to be.
biigD is offline  
Old 05-22-2022, 05:21 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: HUD cripple.
Posts: 313
Default

Originally Posted by ACEssXfer View Post
Yes. Anyone who applied and was hired after the union told us not to. Dweeb is not nearly a strong enough word. These guys/gals absolutely 150% prevented us from getting a deal. Single biggest piece of leverage we'll probably ever get. This will most likely also cause a massive degradation in quality of CKA due to the company's shotgun approach to hiring with the stringent requirement of "legally qualified." The CKA cadre is one of the lone bright spots we have as a company. This is in danger of no longer being the case.
Originally Posted by ny797 View Post
I won’t speak to their ability as a check airmen, because any experience I’ve had with them in my time here has been great. Including recently, though they had all been check airmen for a while. That’s not the point though. The point is that the union leadership asked them to do something (which is huge considering they’re usually afraid of their own shadow) and they selfishly ignored them. There’s no doubt in my mind that despite all the excuses these “dweebs” (to put mildly) have, they single handedly prevented any sort of meaningful negotiations and subsequent TA from being agreed to.
I love a good Lynch mob as much as the next guy, but for the benefit of the class, can either of you share exactly where the APA told, or asked anyone not to apply for, or accept a check airman job?

I'll help you get started, you cant, because they never did. They detailed some possible shortcomings of the job currently, and then said this:

"We encourage any pilot who is considering applying for a CKA position to do your research and to feel free to contact the APA Check Airman Committee for insight into what the position entails under JCBA Section 12".

No "directive" or "foot stomp" there.
nimslow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pilatusguy
Aviation Law
25
02-22-2022 01:21 AM
FormerKalitta
Kalitta Companies
132
01-23-2017 03:01 AM
b190av8r
Technical
15
07-17-2016 08:28 PM
Albief15
FedEx
161
10-02-2015 03:11 PM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices