![]() |
Originally Posted by cornerpocket
(Post 3911788)
Fall of '25 or '26 ???
|
Originally Posted by ACEssXfer
(Post 3911770)
Perfect time to spin up BOS 320 and PHL 737................
|
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 3911868)
Exactly. I'd bet one, BOS 320 most likely, will show up on the next vacancy.
|
Originally Posted by CRJJ
(Post 3911874)
It makes sense for XLR purposes. Would all those senior 73 guys bid 320? I’m curious.
|
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 3911896)
I thought XLR was going to be out of JFK and PHL?
|
Originally Posted by CRJJ
(Post 3911874)
It makes sense for XLR purposes. Would all those senior 73 guys bid 320? I’m curious.
Why do WB flying for a few dollars more but yet so much less than a 777 and 787 guy? I know plenty of people who are going to be outright avoiding it. If they expect me to do long haul flying, I want to get paid for it as a long haul guy.. not some “override” |
Originally Posted by Strykerinf
(Post 3911919)
Why do WB flying for a few dollars more but yet so much less than a 777 and 787 guy? I know plenty of people who are going to be outright avoiding it. If they expect me to do long haul flying, I want to get paid for it as a long haul guy.. not some “override”
I imagine most senior BOS 737 CAs wouldn’t bid en masse for a theoretical BOS 320 CA because of some combination of zero desire to go to training and zero desire to incur a new seat lock. On the other hand, if you live a drivable distance to BOS (seems every BOS pilot I meet lives in New Hampshire) and want “wide body” flying… not commuting to the 777 or 787 might be appealing. |
Originally Posted by Strykerinf
(Post 3911919)
Why do WB flying for a few dollars more but yet so much less than a 777 and 787 guy? I know plenty of people who are going to be outright avoiding it. If they expect me to do long haul flying, I want to get paid for it as a long haul guy.. not some “override”
I think the XLR, BOS or not, is gonna have some pretty cool niche destinations you might not see on the 777/787. I am a little worried about the makeup of the trips based on some scheduling committee statements......... |
Originally Posted by CRJJ
(Post 3911908)
Thats what they keep saying yeah. I’m just saying BOS would make a lot of sense too.
Originally Posted by Strykerinf
(Post 3911919)
Why do WB flying for a few dollars more but yet so much less than a 777 and 787 guy? I know plenty of people who are going to be outright avoiding it. If they expect me to do long haul flying, I want to get paid for it as a long haul guy.. not some “override”
We get paid based on size of the plane not where it goes. |
Originally Posted by Strykerinf
(Post 3911919)
Why do WB flying for a few dollars more but yet so much less than a 777 and 787 guy? I know plenty of people who are going to be outright avoiding it. If they expect me to do long haul flying, I want to get paid for it as a long haul guy.. not some “override”
Never a shortage of AA pilots who find offense easily. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:07 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands