![]() |
Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
(Post 3931494)
Tom Horton should have won.
Nothing good has ever come out of America West. It's an airline that should have folded in the 90s Sadly, around year seven or eight, that started happening to me. |
Originally Posted by MinimumEffort
(Post 3931494)
Tom Horton should have won.
Nothing good has ever come out of America West. It's an airline that should have folded in the 90s ......oh. Seems like a few opportunities missed. |
Originally Posted by tmtbiker
(Post 3931497)
Who did APA back after chapter 11 with their Board vote? Sorry, Tom. But then you got Dougie and Scott! Scott's pretty smart! What's he up to now?
......oh. Seems like a few opportunities missed. |
Originally Posted by WiFly
(Post 3931466)
Then why are our customer satisfaction scores so much lower than Delta and United?
Why are people paying more to fly on them on the same routes than they are to fly on us? Same seat, same airplane type, same route, and yet we still can’t charge as much. Nothing you posted above is accurate to why AA is underperforming. Your previous 3-4 posts have made accusations that are so incredibly inaccurate I question if you’re an actual pilot at American. |
Originally Posted by RippinClapBombs
(Post 3931515)
Jetblue has the highest customer satisfaction score in the industry (AA and UA are basically tied) and they’re on a fast track to Bankruptcy. You have any other BS theories??
Nothing you posted above is accurate to why AA is underperforming. Your previous 3-4 posts have made accusations that are so incredibly inaccurate I question if you’re an actual pilot at American. JetBlue is not competing for business or premium leisure travel. Their yields are low. That’s why they are failing. You can’t have low yields in high cost markets. Who else has low yields? American. In high costs markets. That’s why Delta and United are crushing American - it’s as simple as this: passengers will pay more to fly on those airlines than they will to fly on American. This translates into lower credit card revenue also. Brand loyalty matters, and our brand sucks. |
Originally Posted by WiFly
(Post 3931520)
United’s satisfaction scores are significantly better than American’s (and improving).
Originally Posted by WiFly
(Post 3931520)
JetBlue is not competing for business or premium leisure travel. Their yields are low. That’s why they are failing. You can’t have low yields in high cost markets.
Who else has low yields? American. In high costs markets. That’s why Delta and United are crushing American - This translates into lower credit card revenue also. Almost this entire post is (once again) not accurate, but I don’t care enough to keep correcting your every post—don’t expect another reply when you attempt to throw more sh*t at the wall about employee morale and hope it sticks. I think what you’re attempting to illustrate is JetBlue doesn’t compete for corporate contracts and to be frank neither does American (resulting in lower yields)—all thanks to our current management strategy—that’s why we’re 4 percentage points lower than our two main competitors on profit margins. (With our current revenue that’s roughly $2.5 billion lost profit per year). |
Originally Posted by WiFly
(Post 3931478)
We absolutely have an impact on crew & on time performance. The same people shutting off APUs in 100° heat or sitting 10 feet from the gate refusing to call ops for wing walkers, are the ones *****ing about how poorly the company treats customers.
You can either do your part and demand better from the rest of the company, or keep up the miserable IDGAF attitude. But not both. 30 minutes later still no ramp crew. |
Originally Posted by RippinClapBombs
(Post 3931522)
Not according to J.D. Power
Almost this entire post is (once again) not accurate, but I don’t care enough to keep correcting your every post—don’t expect another reply when you attempt to throw more sh*t at the wall about employee morale and hope it sticks. I think what you’re attempting to illustrate is JetBlue doesn’t compete for corporate contracts and to be frank neither does American (resulting in lower yields)—all thanks to our current management strategy—that’s why we’re 4 percentage points lower than our two main competitors on profit margins. (With our current revenue that’s roughly $2.5 billion lost profit per year). |
Originally Posted by WiFly
(Post 3931478)
We absolutely have an impact on crew & on time performance. The same people shutting off APUs in 100° heat or sitting 10 feet from the gate refusing to call ops for wing walkers, are the ones *****ing about how poorly the company treats customers.
You can either do your part and demand better from the rest of the company, or keep up the miserable IDGAF attitude. But not both. Some stations are notorious for this. Tampa for example. There are 25 people running around the ramp acting like they don’t see or hear a 321 sitting waiting to park and somehow nobody can locate a pair of wands. Every. Time. OPS responds ‘Oh they should be on the way.’ meanwhile we are blocking the alley for 20 minutes while 3 other flights are trying to push. What about when you are all ready to push but the baggage door stays open until D+5. We can complain all we want but it doesn’t matter. The operation moves at its own speed regardless of what we do. |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 3931484)
No one is shutting off APUs in 100° heat.
|
Originally Posted by DogPit
(Post 3931554)
Are you serious?
|
I think a lot of people are overlooking the basics. AA is still digging its way out of its debt hole from the preCOVID fleet renewal. Total debt is currently $38 Billion (https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-t...gs-transcript/) vs United total debt of $27 Billion for United (https://ir.united.com/static-files/e...d-86c244320239)and $16.3 billion for DL (https://ir.delta.com/news/news-detai...s/default.aspx).
Servicing an extra $10 or 20 BILLION dollars in debt is ABSOLUTELY gonna take a bite out of your profit, even if all other factors were the same. It’s as much as a billion dollars reduction in annual profit. |
Originally Posted by Excargodog
(Post 3931561)
I think a lot of people are overlooking the basics. AA is still digging its way out of its debt hole from the preCOVID fleet renewal. Total debt is currently $38 Billion (https://www.fool.com/earnings/call-t...gs-transcript/) vs United total debt of $27 Billion for United (https://ir.united.com/static-files/e...d-86c244320239)and $16.3 billion for DL (https://ir.delta.com/news/news-detai...s/default.aspx).
Servicing an extra $10 or 20 BILLION dollars in debt is ABSOLUTELY gonna take a bite out of your profit, even if all other factors were the same. It’s as much as a billion dollars reduction in annual profit. I am skeptical of United's growth marketing of how every plane on the books is growth vs replacement, but even if that changes and most of the planes turn from growth to replacement, United won't be hampered like we are with their fleet renewal. |
Originally Posted by WiFly
(Post 3931520)
That’s why Delta and United are crushing American - it’s as simple as this: passengers will pay more to fly on those airlines than they will to fly on American.
|
Originally Posted by Easyflier301
(Post 3931564)
can’t say they’re not trying. Growth in passenger revenue per available seat led all network peers for the 4th straight quarter (coinciding with the corporate travel strategy flip flop). Long hill to climb but at least they’re focusing on the right stuff (now).
During the domestic travel boom following COVID, they try to appeal to the low cost customers. Make the service as cheap as possible in order to offer the lowest price possible. Now the money is in the premium market, they now react to that. By the time we actually dig out of the hole to get money from the premium side of the business, bet that will start to weaken like domestic travel has. AA is a rudderless ship with no vision, taking it where ever the wind blows. But since it is such a big ship with small sails, it takes the wind forever to get it to change direction and gain momentum. So by the time that happens, that wind dies. Unlike what WiFi will accuse me of, I still care. I do my best with the resources I have been given. Want me to SET more? Give me more MAX's. I have SET the NG's and according to the CEFA app, it barely makes a dent given how long and how high I need to keep the running engine at to get moving or accelerate up hill. I want us to succeed and haven't given up. But that is how I see AA right now under current management. I am not sold on how Kirby is viewed. I still see United's success as mostly Oscar's credit. Kirby is just good enough to take what Oscar gave him to keep it going. I am not confident that Kirby would have made AA a financial powerhouse if he was chosen over Isom. He would maintain course here just like he has maintained course at UAL. |
So when do we start telling people to go to United or Delta again? Or better yet, when do the several new threads asking for career advice jumping from AA to another legacy come back?
|
Every quarter the same guys on APC act like this is some big surprise. It's been like this since I've been here. I do what I can on the line to make things as good as they can be for the crew, the pax, and the operation (in that order). Beyond that I have no control, so why get my heart rate up over it?
|
Originally Posted by Easyflier301
(Post 3931564)
can’t say they’re not trying. Growth in passenger revenue per available seat led all network peers for the 4th straight quarter (coinciding with the corporate travel strategy flip flop). Long hill to climb but at least they’re focusing on the right stuff (now).
The failure to expand or maintain a competitive international presence was solidified in 2019/2020. They need revenue today. We could place a historic widebody order today and still lose money for years. They've got to slow the leak before they start adding more water to the pool. Any improvement in international presence/revenue in the short term will have to come from the XLR, 787 deliveries, and 777 refurbishments. |
Originally Posted by joepilot50
(Post 3931558)
That is like saying there aren't captains taking planes with inop APU's in DFW and the northeast right now.....
|
Originally Posted by DogPit
(Post 3931583)
I’ve had three flights this week that have delayed boarding because the APU was shutdown on a short turn.
|
Originally Posted by 8802
(Post 3931572)
Exactly.
The failure to expand or maintain a competitive international presence was solidified in 2019/2020. They need revenue today. We could place a historic widebody order today and still lose money for years. They've got to slow the leak before they start adding more water to the pool. Any improvement in international presence/revenue in the short term will have to come from the XLR, 787 deliveries, and 777 refurbishments.
Originally Posted by DogPit
(Post 3931583)
I’ve had three flights this week that have delayed boarding because the APU was shutdown on a short turn.
|
Originally Posted by joepilot50
(Post 3931563)
While this is true, what makes this double whammy of a gut punch is Delta and United are doing their fleet renewal through cash and still raking in the profits. So no increased debt as they take on new planes and still kicking our butt financially. Granted a downturn may change their paying cash for the new planes plan and take on debt, but they are in a good position to do so.
I am skeptical of United's growth marketing of how every plane on the books is growth vs replacement, but even if that changes and most of the planes turn from growth to replacement, United won't be hampered like we are with their fleet renewal. Although I agree that their new aircraft won’t be all growth. They have some elderly 319s and 757s that they will be retiring. |
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3931590)
You can count on it in DFW. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 3931595)
You can also count on the PCA blowing hot air. This is just representative of what is really wrong with the company: the lack of middle management. It should be someone’s job to ensure the PCA actually work.
|
Originally Posted by WiFly
(Post 3931596)
This is so true. Many middle managers I've interacted with have bad attitudes or just frankly don't seem to care. Why do we keep promoting these people? There are plenty of employees who actually care, but those don't seem to be the ones getting promoted.
Witness today's absurd backpatting on SotA which didn't include any slides about future aircraft delivery schedules or more international routes. But we do have great new lounges for people waiting for their flight to Cedar Rapids. |
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 3931608)
If I had to guess I would say because ass kissing, covering and political savvy is how one advances in a corporate environment. Being competent at the required tasks of the position doesn't seem to rate at all. That's doubly true if one has a reputation of making suggestions for improvement (since those tacitly imply the current management isn't perfect).
Witness today's absurd backpatting on SotA which didn't include any slides about future aircraft delivery schedules or more international routes. But we do have great new lounges for people waiting for their flight to Cedar Rapids. *Sarcasm* |
Originally Posted by Varks
(Post 3931294)
I recently A3 home from training. Made it to airport for earlier flight.. Mayhem at gate of course. Agent gives me a middle seat in back of plane. Chatted with Captain and Delta Pilot while waiting. Delta Pilot gets more room coach seat and an isle. He offered to swap with me.
Why did you A3 home from training? You are entitled to A1 home from training. You most likely would have been sitting in first class because you would have been ahead of everyone on the revenue upgrade list. |
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3931613)
Why did you A3 home from training? You are entitled to A1 home from training. You most likely would have been sitting in first class because you would have been ahead of everyone on the revenue upgrade list.
|
Originally Posted by rockelino
(Post 3931620)
Actually it's A1 only on the first and last day of training. During breaks it's A3. Either way - A3 should still be UPG0 (but below A1 UPG0).
ah I figured they were going home after recurrent or possibly a landing sim. Didn't consider long course training. Good catch. |
Originally Posted by 8802
(Post 3931572)
Exactly.
The failure to expand or maintain a competitive international presence was solidified in 2019/2020. They need revenue today. We could place a historic widebody order today and still lose money for years. They've got to slow the leak before they start adding more water to the pool. Any improvement in international presence/revenue in the short term will have to come from the XLR, 787 deliveries, and 777 refurbishments. And that was back when we still had the 330's and 75/76.
Originally Posted by RippinClapBombs
(Post 3931522)
I think what you’re attempting to illustrate is JetBlue doesn’t compete for corporate contracts and to be frank neither does American (resulting in lower yields)—all thanks to our current management strategy—that’s why we’re 4 percentage points lower than our two main competitors on profit margins. (With our current revenue that’s roughly $2.5 billion lost profit per year).
|
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3931629)
This was exactly what Delta was like in the early to mid 2000s when they sucked bad. You'd roll into ATL and wait 45 minutes for a gate. Every Time. And yeah Madea on ops going "WHO DAT???" "AH DONE TOLT YOU DEY ON DEY WAY OUT! WE SHORT STAFFED! YO GONNA HAFTA WAIT!!!" So yeah after a few ghetto beat downs like that you don't bother calling her any more. You just sit and wait and let the system work.
CVG was only a little better but way more polite about it.Delta got their crap together after the management change to Richard Anderson and eventually AA will too. Meanwhile Delta is starting to slip bad as they have become money obsessed and their product is going down hill again. UA wants to conquer the world with no plan to actually govern it and the next downturn will have them furloughing again. We'll keep plodding along as the world's largest regional airline and make just enough money to stay in business. You again? We bankruptcy yet? Shoo. Cue the AA roast fest |
Originally Posted by sn00p
(Post 3931634)
Dude that’s so lame to say.
Cue the AA roast fest AA ain't no gem but because we're all in on domestic. We'll never score big profits but it's also never going away. We'll just keep stumbling along and offering some token International flying. SWA and the ULCCs are on the rocks too and that's going to be good for us. They are our competitors not UA and DL. Let UA and DL battle for king of the hill we'll just keep making money flying Hank Hill to Midland. |
Originally Posted by joepilot50
(Post 3931569)
To me it all screams reactionary.
During the domestic travel boom following COVID, they try to appeal to the low cost customers. Make the service as cheap as possible in order to offer the lowest price possible. Now the money is in the premium market, they now react to that. By the time we actually dig out of the hole to get money from the premium side of the business, bet that will start to weaken like domestic travel has. That being said, considering our present position, he's got a point that we have a larger growth runway in future years in the premium/intl space than the other network carriers. So we can all hope. XLR's coming. new credit card deal starts next year. More 78's on the way and 773's getting new interiors. Still hiring pilots for growth. Let's see where things stand by end of 2026.... |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3931640)
I mean let's be real. United furloughed in 2003 and 2008. I have buddies who got furloughed twice. Both times they went from hiring to furloughing within a couple of months. They're the worst about that. They would have furloughed in covid too if the pilot group hadn't voted to take pay cuts to save the furloughs. They have gone all in on international WB especially Asia and that's going to be the first canary to die in the coal mine on the next downturn. Japan and China are the largest players in that theater and both of their economies are garbage.
AA ain't no gem but because we're all in on domestic. We'll never score big profits but it's also never going away. We'll just keep stumbling along and offering some token International flying. SWA and the ULCCs are on the rocks too and that's going to be good for us. They are our competitors not UA and DL. Let UA and DL battle for king of the hill we'll just keep making money flying Hank Hill to Midland. AA management needs to find direction and vision, because right now we are just good enough which isn’t “good enough”. If you don’t want to be on the winning team and enjoy the perks that come with that like “profit sharing” okay… I’m not a management cheerleader. I do my best when I show for work and I expect management to do the same. I’m sure you’re a cool guy to fly with but your constant mudslinging of the DL and UA cheerleaders comes off super petty even though their “my dad could beat your dad” banter is lame too… Difference is they are on the winning teams right now. |
Originally Posted by sn00p
(Post 3931644)
Honestly, I don’t care about being “king of the hill”. I’m just a stakeholder in AA doing well and want to see AA be the most profitable it can be.
AA management needs to find direction and vision, because right now we are just good enough which isn’t “good enough”. If you don’t want to be on the winning team and enjoy the perks that come with that like “profit sharing” okay… I’m not a management cheerleader. I do my best when I show for work and I expect management to do the same. I’m sure you’re a cool guy to fly with but your constant mudslinging of the DL and UA cheerleaders comes off super petty even though their “my dad could beat your dad” banter is lame too… Difference is they are on the winning teams right now. Do I want AA to succeed? Of course. I need the checks to keep clearing for at least 10ish more years. Do I believe we will ever be the most profitable of the big 3 and offer the best premium product? Not a chance. But I go to work and do my job and let management do their jobs. I don't worry about crap above my pay grade. As long as the pay checks keep cashing that's what I'll keep doing. Now if you're 30 years old and working here you may have a different perspective. I'd be worried too. But you have options. |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3931648)
No you don't get it. I make fun of the cheerleaders because this is just a job not an identity and too many pilots make all about their whole identity.
Do I want AA to succeed? Of course. I need the checks to keep clearing for at least 10ish more years. Do I believe we will ever be the most profitable of the big 3 and offer the best premium product? Not a chance. But I go to work and do my job and let management do their jobs. I don't worry about crap above my pay grade. As long as the pay checks keep cashing that's what I'll keep doing. Now if you're 30 years old and working here you may have a different perspective. I'd be worried too. But you have options. filler |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 3931632)
Go watch the Isom interview on youtube. Corporate revenue is up 10% while industry is flat.
What is he comparing the 10% to? Here is the link to AA's filing. https://americanairlines.gcs-web.com...ancial-results Just look for "total operating revenues". |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3931664)
According to the financials American just filed, their 2025 Q2 revenue was $14.39B and last year 2024 Q2 was $14.32B. That's a 0.4% increase.
What is he comparing the 10% to? Here is the link to AA's filing. https://americanairlines.gcs-web.com...ancial-results Just look for "total operating revenues". Start at four minutes in https://youtu.be/jfQhTxz4QhM?si=wE3QWkB6CHj42une&t=240 |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3931640)
I mean let's be real. United furloughed in 2003 and 2008
|
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3931668)
United has had 2 furloughs since the 1970s. 9/11 and GFC. AA and CAL also furloughed for 9/11 and GFC as did other airlines. Also there is nothing inherently magical about United or any airline that "it" likes to furlough, etc. United last 2 furloughs were different management teams. I laugh when someone says "I don't want to go to United because I am likely to get furloughed. United has hired around 26,000 pilots since 1985 and only about 2,500 have been furloughed, yes some were furloughed twice. That means that the odds that a United pilot was furloughed was less than 10%. Some of the 9/11 furloughs were back after 18 months and that was their only furlough.
If anyone is going to furlough it's not going to be UA. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:04 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands