![]() |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3931629)
This was exactly what Delta was like in the early to mid 2000s when they sucked bad. You'd roll into ATL and wait 45 minutes for a gate. Every Time. And yeah Madea on ops going "WHO DAT???" "AH DONE TOLT YOU DEY ON DEY WAY OUT! WE SHORT STAFFED! YO GONNA HAFTA WAIT!!!" So yeah after a few ghetto beat downs like that you don't bother calling her any more. You just sit and wait and let the system work.
CVG was only a little better but way more polite about it.Delta got their crap together after the management change to Richard Anderson and eventually AA will too. Meanwhile Delta is starting to slip bad as they have become money obsessed and their product is going down hill again. UA wants to conquer the world with no plan to actually govern it and the next downturn will have them furloughing again. We'll keep plodding along as the world's largest regional airline and make just enough money to stay in business. You again? We bankruptcy yet? Shoo. Cue the AA roast fest |
Originally Posted by sn00p
(Post 3931634)
Dude that’s so lame to say.
Cue the AA roast fest AA ain't no gem but because we're all in on domestic. We'll never score big profits but it's also never going away. We'll just keep stumbling along and offering some token International flying. SWA and the ULCCs are on the rocks too and that's going to be good for us. They are our competitors not UA and DL. Let UA and DL battle for king of the hill we'll just keep making money flying Hank Hill to Midland. |
Originally Posted by joepilot50
(Post 3931569)
To me it all screams reactionary.
During the domestic travel boom following COVID, they try to appeal to the low cost customers. Make the service as cheap as possible in order to offer the lowest price possible. Now the money is in the premium market, they now react to that. By the time we actually dig out of the hole to get money from the premium side of the business, bet that will start to weaken like domestic travel has. That being said, considering our present position, he's got a point that we have a larger growth runway in future years in the premium/intl space than the other network carriers. So we can all hope. XLR's coming. new credit card deal starts next year. More 78's on the way and 773's getting new interiors. Still hiring pilots for growth. Let's see where things stand by end of 2026.... |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3931640)
I mean let's be real. United furloughed in 2003 and 2008. I have buddies who got furloughed twice. Both times they went from hiring to furloughing within a couple of months. They're the worst about that. They would have furloughed in covid too if the pilot group hadn't voted to take pay cuts to save the furloughs. They have gone all in on international WB especially Asia and that's going to be the first canary to die in the coal mine on the next downturn. Japan and China are the largest players in that theater and both of their economies are garbage.
AA ain't no gem but because we're all in on domestic. We'll never score big profits but it's also never going away. We'll just keep stumbling along and offering some token International flying. SWA and the ULCCs are on the rocks too and that's going to be good for us. They are our competitors not UA and DL. Let UA and DL battle for king of the hill we'll just keep making money flying Hank Hill to Midland. AA management needs to find direction and vision, because right now we are just good enough which isn’t “good enough”. If you don’t want to be on the winning team and enjoy the perks that come with that like “profit sharing” okay… I’m not a management cheerleader. I do my best when I show for work and I expect management to do the same. I’m sure you’re a cool guy to fly with but your constant mudslinging of the DL and UA cheerleaders comes off super petty even though their “my dad could beat your dad” banter is lame too… Difference is they are on the winning teams right now. |
Originally Posted by sn00p
(Post 3931644)
Honestly, I don’t care about being “king of the hill”. I’m just a stakeholder in AA doing well and want to see AA be the most profitable it can be.
AA management needs to find direction and vision, because right now we are just good enough which isn’t “good enough”. If you don’t want to be on the winning team and enjoy the perks that come with that like “profit sharing” okay… I’m not a management cheerleader. I do my best when I show for work and I expect management to do the same. I’m sure you’re a cool guy to fly with but your constant mudslinging of the DL and UA cheerleaders comes off super petty even though their “my dad could beat your dad” banter is lame too… Difference is they are on the winning teams right now. Do I want AA to succeed? Of course. I need the checks to keep clearing for at least 10ish more years. Do I believe we will ever be the most profitable of the big 3 and offer the best premium product? Not a chance. But I go to work and do my job and let management do their jobs. I don't worry about crap above my pay grade. As long as the pay checks keep cashing that's what I'll keep doing. Now if you're 30 years old and working here you may have a different perspective. I'd be worried too. But you have options. |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3931648)
No you don't get it. I make fun of the cheerleaders because this is just a job not an identity and too many pilots make all about their whole identity.
Do I want AA to succeed? Of course. I need the checks to keep clearing for at least 10ish more years. Do I believe we will ever be the most profitable of the big 3 and offer the best premium product? Not a chance. But I go to work and do my job and let management do their jobs. I don't worry about crap above my pay grade. As long as the pay checks keep cashing that's what I'll keep doing. Now if you're 30 years old and working here you may have a different perspective. I'd be worried too. But you have options. filler |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 3931632)
Go watch the Isom interview on youtube. Corporate revenue is up 10% while industry is flat.
What is he comparing the 10% to? Here is the link to AA's filing. https://americanairlines.gcs-web.com...ancial-results Just look for "total operating revenues". |
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3931664)
According to the financials American just filed, their 2025 Q2 revenue was $14.39B and last year 2024 Q2 was $14.32B. That's a 0.4% increase.
What is he comparing the 10% to? Here is the link to AA's filing. https://americanairlines.gcs-web.com...ancial-results Just look for "total operating revenues". Start at four minutes in https://youtu.be/jfQhTxz4QhM?si=wE3QWkB6CHj42une&t=240 |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3931640)
I mean let's be real. United furloughed in 2003 and 2008
|
Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
(Post 3931668)
United has had 2 furloughs since the 1970s. 9/11 and GFC. AA and CAL also furloughed for 9/11 and GFC as did other airlines. Also there is nothing inherently magical about United or any airline that "it" likes to furlough, etc. United last 2 furloughs were different management teams. I laugh when someone says "I don't want to go to United because I am likely to get furloughed. United has hired around 26,000 pilots since 1985 and only about 2,500 have been furloughed, yes some were furloughed twice. That means that the odds that a United pilot was furloughed was less than 10%. Some of the 9/11 furloughs were back after 18 months and that was their only furlough.
If anyone is going to furlough it's not going to be UA. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:01 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands