![]() |
Originally Posted by skydriver21
(Post 4006791)
Awesome, thanks. Do you know how quickly people are looking to upgrade at AA?
|
Originally Posted by IFR Cx Rcvd
(Post 4006797)
NB CA and WB FO are both sitting around 75-80%. Hard to say how long that’ll take. Without growth that’s ~4-5 years of retirements. Growth+additional retirements, could be just under 3 years.
|
Originally Posted by skydriver21
(Post 4006805)
Got it. Thanks so much for the insight
|
The timeline is definitely getting longer for both. I don't really think it’s helpful for people hired today to look at how long it’s taking ‘21-‘23 hires to hold either seat. Two years won’t happen again any time soon. I’ll probably be able to hold the award on of the next two vacancies which will put the effective dates around 3-3.5 years. For someone hired today I would say plan on 5 years.
NB CA plug is 13499. WB FO plug is 13090. As of today our lowest system seniority number is 17208. The 3700/4100 retirements required to reach those seniority levels will happen during the 2030 calendar year. |
Originally Posted by skydriver21
(Post 4006784)
About how long after getting out of training would you be able to change bases?
|
Originally Posted by Setspeed
(Post 4006933)
I got super lucky and MBE closed was a week after I got hired, finished training almost 3 months later and the MBE was effective the week I finished. So, potentially you never commute if you hit it the first roll, but probably an outlier.
|
Originally Posted by Setspeed
(Post 4006933)
I got super lucky and MBE closed was a week after I got hired, finished training almost 3 months later and the MBE was effective the week I finished. So, potentially you never commute if you hit it the first roll, but probably an outlier.
That’s probably about as long as it would possibly take at this point, maybe 9 months if you are super unlucky. Just sharing my example to point out there could be an outlier in either direction. |
Originally Posted by skydriver21
(Post 4006791)
Awesome, thanks. Do you know how quickly people are looking to upgrade at AA?
Our bids are quarterly and six months out, so our next vacancy will be on March 1 for September 1 training date. That said, at our current rate, I might be awarded it 3 vacancies from now. If that holds the I might be in upgrade class June 2027. The Fall awards (September) tend to have a lot of backfills though, so it’s hard to say. Also, the above only applies to LGA 320/737 maybe MIA 737 and PHL320. YMMV. |
Originally Posted by skydriver21
(Post 4006791)
Awesome, thanks. Do you know how quickly people are looking to upgrade at AA?
|
So- I’m an Aug 22 hire.
Currently there are 300 NB CAs junior to me. By Sept 1st, there will be about 450 junior to me (already awarded/awaiting training/etc.). right now there are only 60 WB FOs junior to me. By Sept 1st there will be 64 junior to me (already awarded/awaiting training/etc.). The first time I could have been awarded 73 CA was for DCA was on the July 2024 results (OCT, NOV, DEC 2024 class dates). I think the next two or three bid cycles went senior to me at all bases. I guess what I’m saying is that seats move at different paces and different directions. You really can’t use anyone else’s experience to manage your expectations. |
Originally Posted by APTAP
(Post 4006982)
So- I’m an Aug 22 hire.
Currently there are 300 NB CAs junior to me. By Sept 1st, there will be about 450 junior to me (already awarded/awaiting training/etc.). right now there are only 60 WB FOs junior to me. By Sept 1st there will be 64 junior to me (already awarded/awaiting training/etc.). The first time I could have been awarded 73 CA was for DCA was on the July 2024 results (OCT, NOV, DEC 2024 class dates). I think the next two or three bid cycles went senior to me at all bases. I guess what I’m saying is that seats move at different paces and different directions. You really can’t use anyone else’s experience to manage your expectations. |
DFW 320 has entered the drop….
|
3/4
BOS/FO/737 3 LAX/FO/737 2 LGA/FO/737 2 MIA/FO/737 3 ORD/FO/737 3 PHX/FO/737 4 DCA/FO/320 4 DFW/FO/320 5 LAX/FO/320 13 ORD/FO/320 8 PHL/FO/320 3 PHX/FO/320 8 LGA/FO/320/D 8 66 total. Wonder why the increase back to a big class |
Originally Posted by Setspeed
(Post 4007428)
3/4
BOS/FO/737 3 LAX/FO/737 2 LGA/FO/737 2 MIA/FO/737 3 ORD/FO/737 3 PHX/FO/737 4 DCA/FO/320 4 DFW/FO/320 5 LAX/FO/320 13 ORD/FO/320 8 PHL/FO/320 3 PHX/FO/320 8 LGA/FO/320/D 8 66 total. Wonder why the increase back to a big class |
Originally Posted by Setspeed
(Post 4007428)
3/4
BOS/FO/737 3 LAX/FO/737 2 LGA/FO/737 2 MIA/FO/737 3 ORD/FO/737 3 PHX/FO/737 4 DCA/FO/320 4 DFW/FO/320 5 LAX/FO/320 13 ORD/FO/320 8 PHL/FO/320 3 PHX/FO/320 8 LGA/FO/320/D 8 66 total. Wonder why the increase back to a big class I honestly wished we just operated like the mob - we have our hubs and they have theirs - and we stay out of each other's business and just print money lol. I remember Parker got in trouble with the SEC for even suggesting capacity discipline. Airlines' undisciplined talk may have led to antitrust probe: experts |
Originally Posted by Name User
(Post 4007656)
When I was looking a few weeks ago, it looks like our flying for this year is +5-10% YOY in block hours. It looks like they are finally tired of UA just adding flights with impunity and taking our YOY growth.
I honestly wished we just operated like the mob - we have our hubs and they have theirs - and we stay out of each other's business and just print money lol. I remember Parker got in trouble with the SEC for even suggesting capacity discipline. Airlines' undisciplined talk may have led to antitrust probe: experts |
Originally Posted by Werjower
(Post 4007736)
Why don’t we just merge all the airlines into one big national airline funded by the US government?
|
Originally Posted by Setspeed
(Post 4007428)
3/4
BOS/FO/737 3 LAX/FO/737 2 LGA/FO/737 2 MIA/FO/737 3 ORD/FO/737 3 PHX/FO/737 4 DCA/FO/320 4 DFW/FO/320 5 LAX/FO/320 13 ORD/FO/320 8 PHL/FO/320 3 PHX/FO/320 8 LGA/FO/320/D 8 66 total. Wonder why the increase back to a big class |
Originally Posted by Werjower
(Post 4007736)
Why don’t we just merge all the airlines into one big national airline funded by the US government?
|
Originally Posted by unblestdevotee
(Post 4007894)
Hey guys. Would someone mind letting me know how long it takes to get CLT and to hold a line in CLT on the bus vs 73? I’ll be in one of the next classes and my local airport only flies direct there so just trying to get an easier commute.
|
CLT Bus Wait
Originally Posted by unblestdevotee
(Post 4007894)
Hey guys. Would someone mind letting me know how long it takes to get CLT and to hold a line in CLT on the bus vs 73? I’ll be in one of the next classes and my local airport only flies direct there so just trying to get an easier commute.
|
Originally Posted by unblestdevotee
(Post 4007894)
Hey guys. Would someone mind letting me know how long it takes to get CLT and to hold a line in CLT on the bus vs 73? I’ll be in one of the next classes and my local airport only flies direct there so just trying to get an easier commute.
|
Originally Posted by flybub
(Post 4007992)
You definitely want the bus in CLT. 737 is small and senior. Unfortunately the bus in CLT has more regional type flying (3 & 4 leg days).
|
Originally Posted by flybub
(Post 4007992)
You definitely want the bus in CLT. 737 is small and senior. Unfortunately the bus in CLT has more regional type flying (3 & 4 leg days).
|
Originally Posted by ps2sunvalley
(Post 4008375)
What status doesn't have 3 leg days? Narrowbody of course.
|
Originally Posted by ps2sunvalley
(Post 4008375)
What status doesn't have 3 leg days? Narrowbody of course.
|
LGA airbus has lots of 1-1 two days and numerous other trips that are2 legs a day
|
Originally Posted by mostpeople
(Post 4008524)
Senior lineholder
If reigning in the optimizer is impossible witchcraft can we at least get more PBS layers to sort through the garbage a little easier? No? Ok got it thanks. |
Airbusdriver has flash cards again....for bus.....
|
Originally Posted by Werjower
(Post 4008504)
If you find out let me know ASAP.
|
Originally Posted by rolo
(Post 4008587)
I’m down to about 40-50% bus FO in CLT and prioritizing 2 legs over 3 in PBS has gotten more complicated. Instead of an RDU turn and leg to Florida for 9 hours you might go to MIA, sit for 3 then off to LAX for a 12 hour day.
If reigning in the optimizer is impossible witchcraft can we at least get more PBS layers to sort through the garbage a little easier? No? Ok got it thanks. One key to somewhat cracking the code is early sign-ins if you can do it. When your duty is chopped to 12 or even a 0459 sign in or earlier cuts flying to 8, the optimizer has less wiggle and youll find some nice 1-2s, 2-2s. 1.45 or less of ground, lend themselves to less soft and higher/hard time trips, longer legs. Just a minor tip if you can deal with the earlies. |
Originally Posted by rolo
(Post 4008587)
If reigning in the optimizer is impossible witchcraft can we at least get more PBS layers to sort through the garbage a little easier?
|
Originally Posted by rolo
(Post 4008587)
I’m down to about 40-50% bus FO in CLT and prioritizing 2 legs over 3 in PBS has gotten more complicated. Instead of an RDU turn and leg to Florida for 9 hours you might go to MIA, sit for 3 then off to LAX for a 12 hour day.
If reigning in the optimizer is impossible witchcraft can we at least get more PBS layers to sort through the garbage a little easier? No? Ok got it thanks. |
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 4008639)
NavBlue would solve many of the PBS issues we have with this janky version we use. Unfortunately the only way we get a real PBS system is through section 6, and im guessing the company would price it very high
|
Originally Posted by DirectTo
(Post 4008636)
Especially annoying to see layers in the software just sitting there, unused.
|
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 4008758)
The latest survey from the union asks if we would like more layers at the expense of longer processing times, which are already worst in the industry. Bidding should open on the 1st of the month.
|
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 4008758)
The latest survey from the union asks if we would like more layers at the expense of longer processing times, which are already worst in the industry. Bidding should open on the 1st of the month.
|
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo
(Post 4008833)
Haha. And yet other airlines manage to use a much deeper bidding system and get lines out earlier than AA currently does.
if all else stayed the same but bidding closed on the 5th we’d have a schedule by the 8th. |
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 4008758)
The latest survey from the union asks if we would like more layers at the expense of longer processing times, which are already worst in the industry. Bidding should open on the 1st of the month.
Why would more layers affect this? |
Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy
(Post 4008765)
Bizarre my schedule doesn't exist for next month until 2/3 of the way through the current month.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands