![]() |
Originally Posted by lolwut
(Post 1516045)
If 69% of DCA is anti-competitive, Southwest really should have to give up an equal amount in DAL when the wright amendment ends and it opens up.
|
Originally Posted by Georgia22
(Post 1515828)
It is amazing that they think they deserve them. What did they have to give up when the merged? Give them to jet blue or spirit.
The Oscar |
Originally Posted by Great Santini
(Post 1516090)
Southwest trying to Buddy-Fk you guys with the merger. Good bunch of guys:(
The Oscar |
Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch
(Post 1516425)
No. What is amazing is that airlines who go through bankruptcy feel they deserve to keep the slots that could be sold to satisfy creditors and maintain pensions for their employees. Just saying!:eek: The Oscar |
Originally Posted by kingairip
(Post 1516427)
Yes. Because the point of bankruptcy is to sell off valuable assets that can produce income after the reorganization. Good idea, genius.
Keeping those assets and merging with another airline to create a monopoly at a slot controlled airport is good for who? Genius? The Oscar The point of BK should be to screw someone in order to benefit you the most? Riiiiight. |
Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch
(Post 1516425)
No. What is amazing is that airlines who go through bankruptcy feel they deserve to keep the slots that could be sold to satisfy creditors and maintain pensions for their employees. Just saying!:eek:
The Oscar |
Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch
(Post 1516429)
Genius,
Keeping those assets and merging with another airline to create a monopoly at a slot controlled airport is good for who? Genius?
Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch
(Post 1516429)
The point of BK should be to screw someone in order to benefit you the most? Riiiiight. |
Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch
(Post 1516425)
No. What is amazing is that airlines who go through bankruptcy feel they deserve to keep the slots that could be sold to satisfy creditors and maintain pensions for their employees. Just saying!:eek:
The Oscar |
Originally Posted by kingairip
(Post 1516443)
Well...let's see. It's obviously good for the creditors in the bankruptcy and the reorganized company. If it wasn't, it wouldn't have been approved by the federal judge overseeing the reorganization, smart guy.
No. The point of bankruptcy is that "it gives to the honest but unfortunate debtor…a new opportunity in life and a clear field for future effort, unhampered by the pressure and discouragement of preexisting debt." But, don't take my word for it, those words are from a 1934 Supreme Court decision. The Oscar The Oscar |
Of course, SWA will never, ever, ever, ever declare BK. It's simply... unthinkable. ;)
I've often wondered... the cost benefits of a common fleet type will one day disappear in the sense that the 737 will eventually be no longer competitive in terms of operating costs and maintenance. Technology marches on. It'll be interesting to see how SWA deals with that when it happens. I'm not wishing ill on anyone. Like most here, I'm simply interested in how we do business. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:03 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands