Vote on Constitutional Amendment and Recal
12-19-2013, 05:43 PM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by A321
We all know what you want, you post the same thing over and over.
Even if YOU want it all gone, the truth is that we will have two separate unions for many months ahead. Many crucial months ahead. We will not all be APA for a while.
Sorry to point out that you can't get your way.
Even if YOU want it all gone, the truth is that we will have two separate unions for many months ahead. Many crucial months ahead. We will not all be APA for a while.
Sorry to point out that you can't get your way.
WD at AWA
12-19-2013, 06:42 PM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 140
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
I dont think you quite understand. Usapa TODAY is a limp as a noodle. They will either not show tomorrow and if they do I fully expect them to continue along the path which they have always followed and make even bigger fools to themselves than they already have.
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
12-19-2013, 09:19 PM
#15
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Originally Posted by A321
We all know what you want, you post the same thing over and over.
Even if YOU want it all gone, the truth is that we will have two separate unions for many months ahead. Many crucial months ahead. We will not all be APA for a while.
Sorry to point out that you can't get your way.
Even if YOU want it all gone, the truth is that we will have two separate unions for many months ahead. Many crucial months ahead. We will not all be APA for a while.
Sorry to point out that you can't get your way.
12-19-2013, 09:33 PM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: B777/CA retired
Posts: 1,486
Man, you two are embarrassing.
Bradford's letter is prime evidence why he must go. Hummel, if gone opens the doors to the crazies. From our perspective that would be entertaining.
The role call amendment is interesting because that was a big no no for the old east ALPA haters. Now it's back because they are making another power play. I'd laugh, except its costing me 2 plus percent of my pay.
This just goes to show that ALPA wasn't the problem with US Air, the pilots were. Same stuff, different union.
Bradford's letter is prime evidence why he must go. Hummel, if gone opens the doors to the crazies. From our perspective that would be entertaining.
The role call amendment is interesting because that was a big no no for the old east ALPA haters. Now it's back because they are making another power play. I'd laugh, except its costing me 2 plus percent of my pay.
This just goes to show that ALPA wasn't the problem with US Air, the pilots were. Same stuff, different union.
12-20-2013, 05:26 AM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
No love loss for either of them, but voted NO on all 3. Too many questions about why this was done, I'm thinking the political outweighed any other reason. Plus, who would take their place? Not the time to be messing with this.
IMHO as always.
IMHO as always.
12-20-2013, 06:29 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 1,353
Originally Posted by R57 relay
No love loss for either of them, but voted NO on all 3. Too many questions about why this was done, I'm thinking the political outweighed any other reason. Plus, who would take their place? Not the time to be messing with this.
IMHO as always.
IMHO as always.
WD at AWA
12-20-2013, 06:47 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: A320 Capt
Posts: 5,294
Originally Posted by Wiskey Driver
Doesn't really matter as they are history anyway. I only hope that the courts and the panel burn usapa at the stake for what they have done.
WD at AWA
WD at AWA
Be careful, often those closet to the fire get burned.
