Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Paying what you can hold not what you fly? >

Paying what you can hold not what you fly?

Search
Notices

Paying what you can hold not what you fly?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2014, 08:55 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
CanoePilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,166
Default Paying what you can hold not what you fly?

Has this idea ever been visited at the major level? I know some of the Euro carriers do this and I don't see why it couldn't be applied here.

For those that don't know, the concept is that pilots would be paid by the number of aircraft in each category in seniority order. For example, it would allow the number 1 guy to fly a e190 and get paid as if he were flying the 330. The main advantage is that people would not have to destroy their bodies flying on the backside of the clock in their old age to be able to make more money.
CanoePilot is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 10:23 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
aapilotguy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 81
Default

So then the bottom guy gets to fly the 330/777 and "destroy his body" for an E190 pay rate? I don't like the sound of that.
aapilotguy is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 11:07 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Saabs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,447
Default

Originally Posted by aapilotguy View Post
So then the bottom guy gets to fly the 330/777 and "destroy his body" for an E190 pay rate? I don't like the sound of that.
Well to be fair our 190 pay rates are pathetic! Pay parity with delta and united except for group I.....

I think this idea has some upside but I think it would be opening up a bigger can of worms....
Saabs is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 12:37 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: B-757/767 Capt.
Posts: 219
Default

Look at the European crews when you see them in customs. They all seem relatively young. The senior (old) guys are flying narrow bodies around Europe with shorter legs, close to home with few time zones and making the biggest bucks. Works great.
I for one would be happy to never fly another international trip. I much prefer domestic but fly international because it's the best money. To me taking off and landing is a lot of fun, the rest is pretty damn boring! On the other hand there are thousands that would LOVE to fly widebodies on international routes that will never get the chance due to seniority. If the pay were what you can hold instead of what you are flying I would be much happier on the S80 or 737 freeing a wide body spot for one who would enjoy it more. It would be a win / win!
CG

Last edited by cubguy; 07-14-2014 at 12:39 PM. Reason: Typo
cubguy is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 01:15 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Default

Why not just make it all a flat pay rate. A rate for CA and F/O, equipment type doesn't matter.

Tough to go back now because a decent chunk of the list would take a pay cut, and chances are they are the same guys (senior CAs) on the negotiating committee.
fosters is offline  
Old 07-14-2014, 05:33 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 403
Default

Originally Posted by fosters View Post
Why not just make it all a flat pay rate. A rate for CA and F/O, equipment type doesn't matter.

Tough to go back now because a decent chunk of the list would take a pay cut, and chances are they are the same guys (senior CAs) on the negotiating committee.
Legacy Continental did that for years. What they got was all senior pilots flying the MD-80's and all the junior pilots flying the heavy equipment. They had to displace because they could not fill CA or FO vacancies on heavy airplane, because senior pilots would not bid it. Thus they had a staffing issue with plenty of staffing. The only way to get people to take advancement was to change equipment pay. The company also had the least experienced and lowest paid (equalling lowest morale) flying heavy equipment around.

In 2007, even after they changed the equipment pay, my friend was awarded 777 as a new hirer FO......at a rate of $29.00 per hour with a one year seat lock. I do not know about you, but why would the company increase pay when they can keep cheap labor on the highest gross equipment, there is no incentive to do so. First year pay at all companies is a shame even today. When a new hirer on WB gets the same as a new hirer on (using US Airways) a 190
drinksonme is offline  
Old 07-15-2014, 09:51 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
btwissel's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Q400 survivor
Posts: 537
Default

Why not make it what you can hold or what you can fly: Whichever is greater?

That way the senior guys can fly the domestic stuff, and the junior guys can fly the heavy INTL stuff, but not at a severe discount to the CO. This way you can pick for QoL/type of flying, and not take a hit for it.

It somehow works for UPS. I do know you have to be senior to get the domestic stuff there, though.
btwissel is offline  
Old 07-15-2014, 11:33 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: B-757/767 Capt.
Posts: 219
Default

How would this work?
Suppose you could hold the 777 but would rather for whatever reasons fly the S80 on short haul.
Suppose I could never touch the 777 due to seniority but it would be my dream to fly international.
If we had a system to bid a position "alternate pay" (or what ever you wanted to call it) where you could bid to fly the S80 at 777 rates cause you can hold it and I could bid 777 at S80 rates because I can't whereby you couldn't get the bid unless someone like me wanted your seat at the lesser rate and even at that you would get the alternate pay position by seniority only. No one would be out any extra money, including the company. I wouldn't be getting screwed because thats what I would be making anyway and you wouldn't be awarded the pay unless there were bidders like me to create your slot. We would both be happier and making the same money we would have anyway.
Just a thought, probably full of holes but surely with some thinking outside of the box something could be engineered.
CG
cubguy is offline  
Old 07-15-2014, 11:42 AM
  #9  
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Swedish Blender's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: fins to the left, fins to the right
Posts: 1,732
Default

Originally Posted by btwissel View Post
It somehow works for UPS. I do know you have to be senior to get the domestic stuff there, though.
Domestic is the most junior flying at UPS.

Apples and oranges though. International at UPS is far different from legacy flying. At UPS, you could do a 14 day trip that only flies 5 legs and be done the rest of the month.
Swedish Blender is online now  
Old 07-15-2014, 12:33 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

Originally Posted by btwissel View Post
Why not make it what you can hold or what you can fly: Whichever is greater?
That would open the door for a sneaky maneuver: senior pilots avoid the 777, but take up a collection and award the cash to the most junior guy who successfully bids it. Then hundreds of guys will get that pay rate without going to school or giving up QOL.
tomgoodman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
PearlPilot
Money Talk
5
03-11-2009 08:55 AM
Mason32
Hangar Talk
8
02-07-2009 07:30 AM
StearmanDriver
Regional
55
03-16-2006 05:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices