Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Both Sides Agree To Private Mediation >

Both Sides Agree To Private Mediation

Search

Notices

Both Sides Agree To Private Mediation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-30-2014 | 11:31 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by drinksonme
Directly from the union update yesterday: "The NMB asked the parties"

Then this today: NMB agrees with flight attendants that American Airlines and US Airways are ?single transportation system? | Dallas Morning News


I thinks it's more of a realization by USAPA, then a worry about SOC
18 month countdown, that they are not really making a case that is going to win over the courts and NMB. If they lose those battles, then they have no legs to stand on. Yes, finishing SOC would put more pressure on the situation, but that seems like protection the company afforded itself IF things went way south, and appeal after appeal racked up over the years. USAPA can TRY to come to an agreement with APA and move forward without all the ugliness with this mediation. I am probably wrong, but this "movement" is a positive thing and hopefully cooler heads are prevailing, but time.....and maybe the courts (hopefully not) will tell.

The NMB declared single carrier status as it pertains to the FA's.

If you read the update from the APFA https://www.apfa.org/hotline/hotline...s/3207-7-29-14, it's interesting how it will happen and the involvement of both unions after the APFA takes over.

Interesting read at the bottom. It says that AFTER the 30 days the APFA will become the new union. HOWEVER, the AFA will STILL represent the US Airways FA's until a JCBA. And even after that, the AFA will continue to process grievances that arose under US Airways.

I guess it's different for a pilots union opposed to a FA union. I mean how can the NMB allow another union to have ANY input after the APFA is declared the union? Unless that's how it's supposed to work...

I'm betting it's stuff like that which will be defined by a protocol agreement for the pilots.

The AFA is on the way out. But they will still be involved even after they are no longer the union. I guess it's not unheard of for USAPA to expect the same... And the NMB doesn't seem to object to this.
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 11:35 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by porqueno
I thought the MOU had a no furlough clause
There is. and it's in effect now and during the JCBA and even after that while a new contract is worked on... So it seems it extends at least well into 2019 and beyond...
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 11:39 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by algflyr
There is a no furlough clause in the MTA. It will be a part of the JCBA. It will also extend beyond the amendment date of the JCBA while in negotiations for a new contract that will come after the JCBA they are currently working on...

Read paragraph 11 of the MOU...
It's my understanding that the MTA is valid only for 18 months after SOC
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 11:54 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fosters
It's my understanding that the MTA is valid only for 18 months after SOC
The MTA is a transition agreement that gets us to a JCBA. Then the JCBA will be in effect. The only thing that had ties to an 18 month countdown was certain protections contained in paragraph 8 of the MOU. The no furlough clause is NOT one of those protections.

And it was 18 months after SOC OR a JCBA and SLI become effective, whichever is earlier. While it's possible a SLI will not be reached before the 18 month limit, I honestly believe it will. The mediation begins in less than a week. A lot will become known after that process runs its course.
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 12:04 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by algflyr
The MTA is a transition agreement that gets us to a JCBA. Then the JCBA will be in effect. The only thing that had ties to an 18 month countdown was certain protections contained in paragraph 8 of the MOU. The no furlough clause is NOT one of those protections.

And it was 18 months after SOC OR a JCBA and SLI become effective, whichever is earlier. While it's possible a SLI will not be reached before the 18 month limit, I honestly believe it will. The mediation begins in less than a week. A lot will become known after that process runs its course.
Well that's nice, makes me feel quite a bit better now. At least we are seeing movement in the right direction. I can see both sides here, I have flown with guys who explicitly said had AWA merged the list like was supposed to happen they would've been completely screwed out of the left seat all together, with just a couple more years left to retire. I support those guys, they will be retired soon, the AWA guys have 20+ years to be a CA...

I understand why USAPA is dragging their feet but also at some point they need to have a come to Jesus moment.
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 12:14 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 427
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by algflyr
The NMB declared single carrier status as it pertains to the FA's.

If you read the update from the APFA https://www.apfa.org/hotline/hotline...s/3207-7-29-14, it's interesting how it will happen and the involvement of both unions after the APFA takes over.

Interesting read at the bottom. It says that AFTER the 30 days the APFA will become the new union. HOWEVER, the AFA will STILL represent the US Airways FA's until a JCBA. And even after that, the AFA will continue to process grievances that arose under US Airways.

I guess it's different for a pilots union opposed to a FA union. I mean how can the NMB allow another union to have ANY input after the APFA is declared the union? Unless that's how it's supposed to work...

I'm betting it's stuff like that which will be defined by a protocol agreement for the pilots.

The AFA is on the way out. But they will still be involved even after they are no longer the union. I guess it's not unheard of for USAPA to expect the same... And the NMB doesn't seem to object to this.

I did read the article. It's the bigger picture. NMB says FA's are one, I highly doubt they will say pilots are not. With regard to grievences, it makes sense that the AFA should handle the grievences THAT AROSE UNDER US AIRWAYS. Why would the APFA handle US AIRWAYS grievences when they never were under US Airways contracts, nor the bargaining agent when those grievences arose. I can easily see the same thing happening with the pilots.
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 12:28 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by porqueno
I thought the MOU had a no furlough clause
There are min block-hours flown for each list, as well as equal reduction language, etc.
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 12:39 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by drinksonme
I did read the article. It's the bigger picture. NMB says FA's are one, I highly doubt they will say pilots are not. With regard to grievences, it makes sense that the AFA should handle the grievences THAT AROSE UNDER US AIRWAYS. Why would the APFA handle US AIRWAYS grievences when they never were under US Airways contracts, nor the bargaining agent when those grievences arose. I can easily see the same thing happening with the pilots.
The NMB didn't say McCaskill-Bond no longer applies at SOC, but the APA can always shoot for the moon. Delay in SLI helps them every bit as much as it helps east pilots.

The mediation is more red tape, but maybe, just maybe the APA will commit to abide by the law rather than telegraph their intention to flout it at SOC.

There is a lawsuit in D.C.... APA won't want to add evidence against themselves, but the delay is marvelous.... What a fine line..
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 01:54 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by drinksonme
I did read the article. It's the bigger picture. NMB says FA's are one, I highly doubt they will say pilots are not. With regard to grievences, it makes sense that the AFA should handle the grievences THAT AROSE UNDER US AIRWAYS. Why would the APFA handle US AIRWAYS grievences when they never were under US Airways contracts, nor the bargaining agent when those grievences arose. I can easily see the same thing happening with the pilots.
I have no doubt the NMB will declare single carrier for the pilots as well. The question is when. They have only declared it for two groups now. For the pilots, they are continuing the investigation. I believe they will consider what happens at mediation next week. If an agreement is reached, the NMB will probably find single carrier almost immediately. The NMB isn't working in a vacuum, they are aware of what else is going on.

Some think USAPA MUST immediately dissolve once the NMB rules single carrier. That's just not how it works. They will have to remain for certain things until everything is settled. Namely grievances and SLI. That's what a protocol agreement will define...
Reply
Old 07-30-2014 | 01:57 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle
There are min block-hours flown for each list, as well as equal reduction language, etc.
The minimum block hours ARE a part of the protections that have the 18 month clock attached... But with no furloughs, they have to fly something, so giving the planes away isn't feasible.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
Major
337
12-05-2011 08:14 AM
CAL73CAPT
United
18
01-16-2011 07:46 AM
Jay5150
Mergers and Acquisitions
36
04-13-2008 06:22 AM
vagabond
Foreign
2
02-23-2008 11:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices