Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1727291)

Otherwise, using other SLIs, could you possibly see a result that would come out "Nic like"?

Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1727294)

So your are going to tell the board to ignore that little transition agreement that you guys wanted?

Hey, here's a golden oldie for ya. You remember when you guys thought the MOU completed they TA and you would be bidding with us? That was a good one! Took a lot of ties to pay for that fine legal opinion!

Thanks cacti, you cured my insomnia. Bedtime story:

"Any change in seniority “must rationally
promote the aggregate welfare of employees in the bargaining unit.” Id. This low standard
means that so long as a Court can find some legitimate union purpose motivating a seniority
change, the union has not breached its duty of fair representation."

Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1727295)

i would expect it to come out "Nic. Like" so should you! relative position is how all the last sli's came out.

Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1727297)

Yeah, we sure have lost in court a lot lately but don't ignore the reason of why we are losing, "ripeness" in our case as defined by the 9th circuit, the arbitrators will have no such worries.

Originally Posted by cactiboss (Post 1727299)

Btw I will reiterate, in my opinion, if the west has a seat the sli there is a better than even chance the usairways pilots will be in Nicolau order.

Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1727298)

Oh, I thought you meant with us in an order like we were on the Nic, not the Nic type process. That was more slotting by equipment thought. If the panel does that with the staus quo, it will look nothing like the old Nic order.

Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1727300)

They won't be worried about ripeness. That's a legal thing.

Originally Posted by R57 relay (Post 1727303)

BTW, you have any timeline on your appeal? Haven't heard anything about it recently.