AAL submits proposal

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 45

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-11-2014, 02:27 PM

#11

Al Czervik

You scratched my anchor

Joined APC: Feb 2011

Posts: 4,876

WSJ is saying DL +3%

5 seat scope is off the table.. What about the scope details of 76 seats?

11-11-2014, 02:35 PM

#12

Route66

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Nov 2014

Posts: 1,238

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglefly

Profit sharing is an annual variable, whereas set pay rates are constant, so I think its tough to quantify that. I'm more concerned about the other details and MOST especially the contract language. After decades at Eagle, I have a sore spot for deliberately ambiguous contract language designed to favor management and maximize victory in arbitration disputes.

I will wait for the proposal to reach my inbox but if the flight attendant logic prevails in the pilot ranks and a hold out for profit sharing is the reason, I expect arbitration is the lesser cost of for the company then the current proposal. If you've been hired by the New American then all I can say is "welcome to the big leagues".

11-11-2014, 03:04 PM

#13

NC43rd

Line Holder

Joined APC: Oct 2014

Posts: 40

I would expect Delta +3% with little improvements to existing work rules.

11-11-2014, 03:04 PM

#14

Al Czervik

You scratched my anchor

Joined APC: Feb 2011

Posts: 4,876

It's on APA site

11-11-2014, 03:14 PM

#15

texaspilot76

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Feb 2007

Position: Right Seat

Posts: 1,458

What do you use to login to the APA website? I tried my AA employee number and it didn't work.

11-11-2014, 03:16 PM

#16

Arado 234

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Nov 2013

Posts: 1,764

Quote:

Originally Posted by texaspilot76

What do you use to login to the APA website? I tried my AA employee number and it didn't work.

Has anyone here received an APA welcome letter? All I get are their emails...

11-11-2014, 03:39 PM

#17

CanoePilot

Gets Weekends Off

Joined APC: Jun 2012

Posts: 1,166

It's worse than 5 extra seats. They want to be able to add more 70 and 76 seat RJ's. So yeah they don't want more seats to the current RJ fleet they want to be able to have a BIGGER rj fleet with the current seats.