AAG places new Group 1 aircraft order
01-30-2015, 08:36 AM
#2
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: A320 F/O
Posts: 442
I sure hope so. More mainline flying coming back, at rates much higher than they used to be. Now new hires are making almost double what I made. Lucky SOB's.
Que the "they're going to park 250 A319's" crowd in 3...2...1...
On a side note, thread titles like this should be moderator cut.
Que the "they're going to park 250 A319's" crowd in 3...2...1...
On a side note, thread titles like this should be moderator cut.
01-30-2015, 08:44 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,447
Originally Posted by inline five
I sure hope so. More mainline flying coming back, at rates much higher than they used to be. Now new hires are making almost double what I made. Lucky SOB's.
Que the "they're going to park 250 A319's" crowd in 3...2...1...
On a side note, thread titles like this should be moderator cut.
Que the "they're going to park 250 A319's" crowd in 3...2...1...
On a side note, thread titles like this should be moderator cut.
I think yes and no voters agree this scenario could happen regardless of the end result
Let's hope for the best.
01-30-2015, 08:51 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: 320 FO
Posts: 128
Originally Posted by Saabs
I think they are parking 320s this year, older ones obviously.
I think yes and no voters agree this scenario could happen regardless of the end result
Let's hope for the best.
I think yes and no voters agree this scenario could happen regardless of the end result
Let's hope for the best.
01-30-2015, 08:54 AM
#7
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: A320 F/O
Posts: 442
Originally Posted by Saabs
I think they are parking 320s this year, older ones obviously.
I think yes and no voters agree this scenario could happen regardless of the end result
Let's hope for the best.
I think yes and no voters agree this scenario could happen regardless of the end result
Let's hope for the best.
And refurbishing all the 319's and taking delivery of more.
If anything were going away due to Group I it would be the 319, yes?
01-30-2015, 08:56 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: fo
Posts: 179
Can't believe we are still hashing this out...
Doesn't the JCBA pay group I significantly more under the JCBA vs the MTA? An aircraft order could have occurred either way.
And for all those who ***** and whine about everything and would like to be just like our Delta counterparts, you oughta pack your fu&$@%# bags and go work for Delta already. You aren't being held hostage here.
Doesn't the JCBA pay group I significantly more under the JCBA vs the MTA? An aircraft order could have occurred either way.
And for all those who ***** and whine about everything and would like to be just like our Delta counterparts, you oughta pack your fu&$@%# bags and go work for Delta already. You aren't being held hostage here.
01-30-2015, 09:03 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Position: 320 FO
Posts: 128
Originally Posted by psw757
Can't believe we are still hashing this out...
Doesn't the JCBA pay group I significantly more under the JCBA vs the MTA? An aircraft order could have occurred either way.
And for all those who ***** and whine about everything and would like to be just like our Delta counterparts, you oughta pack your fu&$@%# bags and go work for Delta already. You aren't being held hostage here.
Doesn't the JCBA pay group I significantly more under the JCBA vs the MTA? An aircraft order could have occurred either way.
And for all those who ***** and whine about everything and would like to be just like our Delta counterparts, you oughta pack your fu&$@%# bags and go work for Delta already. You aren't being held hostage here.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
