Delta group 1 vs AA group 1
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,889
Delta group 1 vs AA group 1
In the sake of proper comparisons,
Delta E190 is in Group 1, as is AA.
Delta 717 is a Group 2 aircraft and should be compared with AA Group 2.
If AA was operating the 717, it too would be in Group 2. This was tried and tested when they attempted to stick the A319 (110-120 seats) into Group 1 and we flatly rejected it. It is now in group 2.
Just FYI for all the conspiracy theorists out there who are saying that Delta pilots are flying the 717 as a group 1 aircraft.
Delta E190 is in Group 1, as is AA.
Delta 717 is a Group 2 aircraft and should be compared with AA Group 2.
If AA was operating the 717, it too would be in Group 2. This was tried and tested when they attempted to stick the A319 (110-120 seats) into Group 1 and we flatly rejected it. It is now in group 2.
Just FYI for all the conspiracy theorists out there who are saying that Delta pilots are flying the 717 as a group 1 aircraft.
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Scratching my head in the right seat of a Douglas product
Posts: 225
In the sake of proper comparisons,
Delta E190 is in Group 1, as is AA.
Delta 717 is a Group 2 aircraft and should be compared with AA Group 2.
If AA was operating the 717, it too would be in Group 2. This was tried and tested when they attempted to stick the A319 (110-120 seats) into Group 1 and we flatly rejected it. It is now in group 2.
Just FYI for all the conspiracy theorists out there who are saying that Delta pilots are flying the 717 as a group 1 aircraft.
Delta E190 is in Group 1, as is AA.
Delta 717 is a Group 2 aircraft and should be compared with AA Group 2.
If AA was operating the 717, it too would be in Group 2. This was tried and tested when they attempted to stick the A319 (110-120 seats) into Group 1 and we flatly rejected it. It is now in group 2.
Just FYI for all the conspiracy theorists out there who are saying that Delta pilots are flying the 717 as a group 1 aircraft.
#4
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Scratching my head in the right seat of a Douglas product
Posts: 225
I know what you are saying. I was just trying to give the only "real world" 100 seat scenario I could think of. The Delta E190s are still somewhere off in Wonderland.
#7
Banned
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Position: A320 F/O
Posts: 442
Would be like comparing a 777 rate to a 320 rate. Yes it's more, "duh".
Personally I'm glad we have RJs on property here, and hope it expands while downsizing the commuters.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,889
Apples to apples comparisons please. Delta 717 is not a valid comparison to AA group 1.
#10
AA pilots would have never accepted placing the 717 in Group 1. same scenario as when management tried putting the A319 in Group 1 with less seats. Not gonna happen. 717 would have been group 2 at AA: group 1 would have been redefined with less seats in order to accommodate the 717 in group 2.
Apples to apples comparisons please. Delta 717 is not a valid comparison to AA group 1.
Apples to apples comparisons please. Delta 717 is not a valid comparison to AA group 1.
DL 717: 110 seats.
a. Group I: With the exception of aircraft identified in Groups II through V below, any aircraft configured (i.e. as operated by American Airlines) with greater than seventy-six (76) seats and less than one-hundred-eighteen (118) seats, including E190/195, CRJ-1000, MRJ- 100, and Bombardier CS100.
717 is not "identified" in groups II-V
Last edited by Al Czervik; 01-30-2015 at 12:51 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post