Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
The Epsic case has been presented..... >

The Epsic case has been presented.....

Search
Notices

The Epsic case has been presented.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2015, 11:24 AM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default The Epsic case has been presented.....

So just finished reading day 4 transcripts. I have changed my mind about Silver's order. The east pilots that took the stand all blatantly (the arbs well aware) lied and for the most part couldn't even explain how they came up with their list or how it worked. I am very pleased the east is still relying on emotion and lies to argue a fact based case.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 01:27 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
So just finished reading day 4 transcripts. I have changed my mind about Silver's order. The east pilots that took the stand all blatantly (the arbs well aware) lied and for the most part couldn't even explain how they came up with their list or how it worked. I am very pleased the east is still relying on emotion and lies to argue a fact based case.
I haven't read yesterday's transcripts, but so far, while I believe the East's presentation was a overly concocted, self-serving stretch of a methodology with graphs, subjective and divergent applications and testimony from professors of "fluid dynamics" (or whatever) dazzling (or possibly stupefying) the audience with pilot projection "flows" and higher math, I think it was still based on a flawed foundation that seemed more engineered to distract the arbitrators away from the Nic, PMCE or LAA pre-merger equities and although I think the arbitrators will find little to support their proposal, I don't think they will see it in the emotional framework you apparently do.

I expect Freund's presentation will be much more coherent, mainstream and grounded in his UAL/CAL victory of times past and why that should be the model (after inclusion of the Nic first, of course ) that should be adopted, making Wilder's presentation appear muddled and schizophrenic by comparison. Relax, I think you'll be able to puff your chest out a bit once Jeff is through. My only suggestion for the West committee is to avoid the part in their proposal about how a pilot or two on the East side referred to their fellow arbitrator's mental state in regard to composing his award in the U/AWA SLI. It served no purpose in written form and would be outright inappropriate in actual argument and would backfire as to any desired result it might achieve. I don't think arbitrators embrace excessive emotion or those who try to play that upon them as a hopefully beneficial tactic.

Last edited by eaglefly; 10-03-2015 at 01:39 PM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 01:39 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

CB is emotional, and EF is verbose. It's all a show. Please hold the applause until the end.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 01:52 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by PurpleTurtle View Post
CB is emotional, and EF is verbose. It's all a show. Please hold the applause until the end.
All the world's a stage.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 02:25 PM
  #5  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
I haven't read yesterday's transcripts, but so far, while I believe the East's presentation was a overly concocted, self-serving stretch of a methodology with graphs, subjective and divergent applications and testimony from professors of "fluid dynamics" (or whatever) dazzling (or possibly stupefying) the audience with pilot projection "flows" and higher math, I think it was still based on a flawed foundation that seemed more engineered to distract the arbitrators away from the Nic, PMCE or LAA pre-merger equities and although I think the arbitrators will find little to support their proposal, I don't think they will see it in the emotional framework you apparently do.

I expect Freund's presentation will be much more coherent, mainstream and grounded in his UAL/CAL victory of times past and why that should be the model (after inclusion of the Nic first, of course ) that should be adopted, making Wilder's presentation appear muddled and schizophrenic by comparison. Relax, I think you'll be able to puff your chest out a bit once Jeff is through. My only suggestion for the West committee is to avoid the part in their proposal about how a pilot or two on the East side referred to their fellow arbitrator's mental state in regard to composing his award in the U/AWA SLI. It served no purpose in written form and would be outright inappropriate in actual argument and would backfire as to any desired result it might achieve. I don't think arbitrators embrace excessive emotion or those who try to play that upon them as a hopefully beneficial tactic.
I wonder if the east case is some sort of set up for future lawsuit? I mean the arbs are intimately familiar with this case and its history. From Mda to the third listers to acceptance of the Nic, all well established in the arbitration community yet the people charged with putting east list together we're blissfuly unaware of any of it. As for Freund not worried one bit, the west has a fact based proposal that includes both status and longevity categories vs aapsic with only cat/status ala cal.

P.S, don't get me wrong, I expect laa pilots to do very well in this sli, just not as well as they are asking for.
cactiboss is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 02:32 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Exclamation

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
I wonder if the east case is some sort of set up for future lawsuit? I mean the arbs are intimately familiar with this case and its history. From Mda to the third listers to acceptance of the Nic, all well established in the arbitration community yet the people charged with putting east list together we're blissfuly unaware of any of it. As for Freund not worried one bit, the west has a fact based proposal that includes both status and longevity categories vs aapsic with only cat/status ala cal.

P.S, don't get me wrong, I expect laa pilots to do very well in this sli, just not as well as they are asking for.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but *could* it be that you are maybe perhaps just a tad slightly obsessed with this whole thing?

What are you gonna do when all this is over?
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 02:37 PM
  #7  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,240
Default

Originally Posted by Arado 234 View Post
I don't have a dog in this fight, but *could* it be that you are maybe perhaps just a tad slightly obsessed with this whole thing?

What are you gonna do when all this is over?
Buy a bigger non wood boat and fixed it up while pulling reserve in lax
cactiboss is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 03:45 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,967
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
I wonder if the east case is some sort of set up for future lawsuit?...
Why would you think that?? Because that is what the west did by supporting the MOU just to sue?

The West has been obsessed with litigation for ten years and were never willing to negotiate anything. On the other hand, the East supported negotiating a Protocol Agreement that allowed us all to move forward, including the possibility of a West Committee.

You seem to be projecting the west strategy on others.

It will be fair and equitable. No one stupid enough to start a lawsuit will win, unless you are a lawyer promoting continued employment.

Really.. The BOA decision will be fair, equitable, and implemented, as soon as IT catches up.
PurpleTurtle is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 07:24 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Arado 234's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,764
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
Buy a bigger non wood boat and fixed it up while pulling reserve in lax
What is it with pilots AND boats?
Arado 234 is offline  
Old 10-03-2015, 09:11 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 431
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
Buy a bigger non wood boat and fixed it up while pulling reserve in lax
Well that ought to make the LAA guys sympathetic to your cause - take the extra money you got through merging with LAA and then go to their base and take one of their jobs. Is it any wonder the LAA guys don't seem to excited about this merger? At least wait until the award is final before you start boasting about taking one of their positions. Probably the only way to stick a knife a little deeper is if you had said while pulling 787 CA reserve.

Your statements just highlight why the East and LAA pilots have issues with this merger. The West guys don't seem to just want what they brought to this merger they want what the other two groups brought to the merger.

Unless it's your intent to irritate the LAA/East guys on purpose it might be more civil if you would tone down your intentions of taking the other groups' flying as soon as you get a chance. I haven't seen post yet where an LAA guy has said he can't wait to go to PHX and start flying Hawaii.
Upsddown is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
3154
06-25-2014 10:54 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
9
06-15-2013 07:23 AM
FormerEagle
The Boneyard
2
06-16-2009 02:24 PM
Jessemh
Hangar Talk
0
04-16-2009 05:40 AM
jdr7225
Regional
100
04-15-2008 12:38 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices