Atlas Air Imputed Income
#41
The problem is that we don't really fight. We make grandiose statements to our pilots. We tell them "You're either with us or against us!". The truth is that when it's really time to grab spears and shields, the folk making grand statements don't show up.
More importantly we don't shut-up. I just finished a trip. During this flight a gentleman name-dropped a pilot and described what the stewards are doing for that person. That person name-dropped another pilot and described what pro-standards was doing about that person. All of this was unsolicited by anyone on the flight deck. So pro-standards and the stewards are leaking information to this guy. I'm sure they're thinking they are speaking to a trustworthy friend, albeit inappropriately. He's casually using this information to build rapport with new pilots. The result is yet another breakdown and yet another example of systems failing to perform as advertised.
But we're telling our pilots they're the problem? That, my friend, is institutional cowardice. You're personally better than this.
Instead of issuing more grand statements let's get ourselves together. That means cleaning up our own act. It also means not painting with a broad brush. There are people there willing to work with us and be reasonable. Calling them thugs paints them into a corner and turns potential partners into enemies. This is a weak leader's gambit to build support underneath himself while compromising the greater effort. Instead cite the people that help. We're not fighting a monolith. This type of thinking blinds us to potential opportunities and advantages.
More importantly we don't shut-up. I just finished a trip. During this flight a gentleman name-dropped a pilot and described what the stewards are doing for that person. That person name-dropped another pilot and described what pro-standards was doing about that person. All of this was unsolicited by anyone on the flight deck. So pro-standards and the stewards are leaking information to this guy. I'm sure they're thinking they are speaking to a trustworthy friend, albeit inappropriately. He's casually using this information to build rapport with new pilots. The result is yet another breakdown and yet another example of systems failing to perform as advertised.
But we're telling our pilots they're the problem? That, my friend, is institutional cowardice. You're personally better than this.
Instead of issuing more grand statements let's get ourselves together. That means cleaning up our own act. It also means not painting with a broad brush. There are people there willing to work with us and be reasonable. Calling them thugs paints them into a corner and turns potential partners into enemies. This is a weak leader's gambit to build support underneath himself while compromising the greater effort. Instead cite the people that help. We're not fighting a monolith. This type of thinking blinds us to potential opportunities and advantages.
#42
I have been at Atlas a long time. We had pilots working overtime while many of us were furloughed. Sad, but true...
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 693
The problem is that we don't really fight. We make grandiose statements to our pilots. We tell them "You're either with us or against us!". The truth is that when it's really time to grab spears and shields, the folk making grand statements don't show up.
More importantly we don't shut-up. I just finished a trip. During this flight a gentleman name-dropped a pilot and described what the stewards are doing for that person. That person name-dropped another pilot and described what pro-standards was doing about that person. All of this was unsolicited by anyone on the flight deck. So pro-standards and the stewards are leaking information to this guy. I'm sure they're thinking they are speaking to a trustworthy friend, albeit inappropriately. He's casually using this information to build rapport with new pilots. The result is yet another breakdown and yet another example of systems failing to perform as advertised.
But we're telling our pilots they're the problem? That, my friend, is institutional cowardice. You're personally better than this.
Instead of issuing more grand statements let's get ourselves together. That means cleaning up our own act. It also means not painting with a broad brush. There are people there willing to work with us and be reasonable. Calling them thugs paints them into a corner and turns potential partners into enemies. This is a weak leader's gambit to build support underneath himself while compromising the greater effort. Instead cite the people that help. We're not fighting a monolith. This type of thinking blinds us to potential opportunities and advantages.
More importantly we don't shut-up. I just finished a trip. During this flight a gentleman name-dropped a pilot and described what the stewards are doing for that person. That person name-dropped another pilot and described what pro-standards was doing about that person. All of this was unsolicited by anyone on the flight deck. So pro-standards and the stewards are leaking information to this guy. I'm sure they're thinking they are speaking to a trustworthy friend, albeit inappropriately. He's casually using this information to build rapport with new pilots. The result is yet another breakdown and yet another example of systems failing to perform as advertised.
But we're telling our pilots they're the problem? That, my friend, is institutional cowardice. You're personally better than this.
Instead of issuing more grand statements let's get ourselves together. That means cleaning up our own act. It also means not painting with a broad brush. There are people there willing to work with us and be reasonable. Calling them thugs paints them into a corner and turns potential partners into enemies. This is a weak leader's gambit to build support underneath himself while compromising the greater effort. Instead cite the people that help. We're not fighting a monolith. This type of thinking blinds us to potential opportunities and advantages.
Secondly, just as a Capt sets the tone on the flight deck, so too does upper management. They set the tone.
Your tone is frankly quite "Pollyannish". You don't want to hear the bad stuff, it upsets you. So you prefer to concentrate on the few good people in management. Sure, I'm willing to grant a few exist, but here the problem is the same: If good people FAIL to speak up and correct the DYSFUNCTION that exists in every organization then it's allowed to fester and grow.
This is exactly the point I'm trying to make. If you're not fighting the dysfunction (because it upsets you to call it out) unfortunately you're also contributing to its spread.
Sorry to bring the bad news, but it's the unvarnished truth so many "company guys" need to hear. Stop enabling corrupt leadership.
#44
You lost me... If you don’t run for an elected union position, you’re not allowed to expect professionalism from your “elected” union representatives?
#45
Dude. Seriously.. how would you know.. you didn’t work there. **** and be retired already! Also the pilot shortage is/will be back much sooner than you think. Early outs at most of the majors means I would be willing to bet a few pay checks that you will start seeing new hire Classes at the big 3 before the end of the year in order to be properly staffed for summer 2022.
Good luck and I wish you all great success.
#46
#47
#48
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: King Air 350 Captain
Posts: 72
So uhhh,
This thread has been pretty active recently but not really informative
Can I ask, how is imputed income being handled now in 2021? Is it still like it was in 2019 when this thread started or has it changed in any way?
This thread has been pretty active recently but not really informative
Can I ask, how is imputed income being handled now in 2021? Is it still like it was in 2019 when this thread started or has it changed in any way?
#49
They really haven’t done any imputed income unless you fail to reconcile your expenses that were charged to your company card.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: Wind checker
Posts: 763
There is probably a lot of truth to that. I spent a few years there and left in 2015. I wasn’t charged imputed for any of my three years there. I asked a captain about it and he said “Don’t cause the money folks problems and they won’t cause you any. Dick up your credit card and see what happens.”
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post