Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > Atlas/Polar
Amazon Buys 767-300's. Who will fly them? >

Amazon Buys 767-300's. Who will fly them?

Search
Notices

Amazon Buys 767-300's. Who will fly them?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2021, 10:18 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Swakid8's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,427
Default

Originally Posted by Bellinbiker View Post
The 777f has the same wing as the 777-300er. I think it’s going to be awhile for them to start converting 772s especially since we are still over a year out from the first 300er conversion.
You are correct, just the Engines are slightly derated.
Swakid8 is offline  
Old 01-22-2021, 09:41 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 493
Default

Did anybody notice that Amazon today filed an appeal at the NLRB? Apparently, the NLRB allowed mail-in voting in the unionization drive at one of Amazon's warehouses in Alabama because of Covid, and Amazon objects to this varying of the normal law that requires voting in person.

Amazon apparently thinks that mail-in voting in union elections is subject to manipulation.
wjcandee is offline  
Old 01-22-2021, 09:48 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 687
Default

Originally Posted by wjcandee View Post
Amazon apparently thinks that mail-in voting in union elections is subject to manipulation.
Or, worse, that people liable to actually vote. Can't have that.
CardboardCutout is offline  
Old 01-22-2021, 11:12 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by wjcandee View Post
Did anybody notice that Amazon today filed an appeal at the NLRB? Apparently, the NLRB allowed mail-in voting in the unionization drive at one of Amazon's warehouses in Alabama because of Covid, and Amazon objects to this varying of the normal law that requires voting in person.

Amazon apparently thinks that mail-in voting in union elections is subject to manipulation.
I noticed.

And unless I've completely lost my mind, I recall mailing in union ballots several times before.

Let's talk straight: Amazon would have disputed the process no matter what.
zerozero is offline  
Old 01-22-2021, 04:54 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,349
Default

Originally Posted by zerozero View Post
I noticed.

And unless I've completely lost my mind, I recall mailing in union ballots several times before.

Let's talk straight: Amazon would have disputed the process no matter what.
Voting is vital. It's the only real say we have in our futures. It would be nice if we got the chance to do so. As is, are we able to criticize moves to limit representation elsewhere? We are in trusteeship, lead by people who have exceeded their mandate or have been installed by people we don't know.

Pot, meet kettle.
Elevation is offline  
Old 01-23-2021, 03:21 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 694
Default

Originally Posted by Elevation View Post
Voting is vital. It's the only real say we have in our futures. It would be nice if we got the chance to do so. As is, are we able to criticize moves to limit representation elsewhere? We are in trusteeship, lead by people who have exceeded their mandate or have been installed by people we don't know.

Pot, meet kettle.
Fair enough.

Apple meet orange.
zerozero is offline  
Old 03-08-2021, 04:54 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,809
Default Interesting

https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/amazon-spends-131-million-for-stake-in-cargo-airline-atsg-1.1573977?fbclid=IwAR3j6zyw5F2tRDutKqJAXhDeYzi1lG5 anLB2O5mROMOpYzDKwhV_E39SSIc#.YEZxIPURIWo.facebook
nitefr8dog is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 06:53 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,128
Default

Originally Posted by nitefr8dog View Post
https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/amazon-spends-131-million-for-stake-in-cargo-airline-atsg-1.1573977?fbclid=IwAR3j6zyw5F2tRDutKqJAXhDeYzi1lG5 anLB2O5mROMOpYzDKwhV_E39SSIc#.YEZxIPURIWo.facebook
What wasn't in the article was that Amazon was very careful to remain under 20% ownership so as to not trigger public reporting law requirements.... they also bypassed putting a member on the BOD for the same reason. They ended up at 19.5% ownership.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 11:02 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
What wasn't in the article was that Amazon was very careful to remain under 20% ownership so as to not trigger public reporting law requirements.... they also bypassed putting a member on the BOD for the same reason.(IS MY BEST GUESS) They ended up at 19.5% ownership.
There fixed it for you. Unless you just played golf with JB.
nitefr8dog is offline  
Old 03-16-2021, 11:23 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Default

Maybe this'll help clear things up:
Beneficial Ownership Reports – Public Company SEC Reporting Requirements for Insiders
If a company has registered a class of its equity securities under the Exchange Act, shareholders who acquire more than 5% of the outstanding shares of that class must file beneficial owner reports on Schedule 13D or 13G until their holdings drop below 5%. These filings contain background information about the shareholders who file them as well as their investment intentions, providing investors and the company with information about accumulations of securities that may potentially change or influence company management and policies.
Public Company SEC Reporting Requirements and Transaction Reporting by Officers, Directors and 10% Shareholders
Section 16 of the Exchange Act applies to an SEC reporting company’s directors and officers, as well as shareholders who own more than 10% of a class of the company’s equity securities registered under the Exchange Act. The rules under Section 16 require these “insiders” to report most of their transactions involving the company’s equity securities to the SEC within two business days.

Section 16 also establishes mechanisms for a company to recover “short swing” profits, or profits an insider realizes from a purchase and sale of the company’s security that occur within a six-month period. In addition, Section 16 prohibits short selling by insiders of any class of the company’s securities, whether or not that class is registered under the Exchange Act.
Seneca Pilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
whalesurfer
Cargo
22
03-19-2019 10:39 AM
Czech Airman
Cargo
10
12-27-2015 09:16 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
5
09-14-2007 10:53 PM
ultradrvr
Cargo
0
03-09-2007 06:32 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices