Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > Atlas/Polar
Agreement Reach Improvements to current CBA. >

Agreement Reach Improvements to current CBA.

Search
Notices

Agreement Reach Improvements to current CBA.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2021, 12:08 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 126
Default

The company was the one who negotiated for the OT “cap”. They wanted to prevent a handful of pilots who VX every day off from timing out by the end of the year then having to sit at home on min guarantee during peak. The funny thing is anyone in that situation this year worked their ass off under the old pay scale to then sit at home under the new.
plift is offline  
Old 12-30-2021, 04:04 PM
  #72  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,091
Default

Out of 2500 pilots we probably have 3-4 that manage to game the system that way.
Not a reason to cap the pilot group
Not for the company considering all the other wasteful spending and certainly shouldn’t be for a union.
Thing that irks me is that it was kept under wraps for so long and the pilot group wasn’t asked for input.
IRDGAFF what UPS does really.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 12-30-2021, 05:24 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Position: 777 Left window seat
Posts: 640
Default

The company would save more $$ if they capped the number of Sr VPs, VPs, Sr Directors, and Directors at a headcount of 130. I’ve never seen an airline as top heavy with senior “management” as Atlas.
Birdsmash is offline  
Old 12-30-2021, 09:29 PM
  #74  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 92
Default

Let’s be honest the OT cap was something that nobody asked for. But a select few decided we needed it and so now we have it. You can try and explain away all day how it’s really not a cap, but it’s a cap.
121guy is offline  
Old 12-30-2021, 10:05 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
C17B74's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Posts: 1,505
Default

And what did we lose for it… Erosion of Seniority. What did we gain for it - “Fairness”

*Either way can be argued, but it should have been brought forward before we got wind of it as TS mentioned. It only makes things smell more like kaka!
C17B74 is offline  
Old 12-31-2021, 01:00 AM
  #76  
All is fine at .79
 
TiredSoul's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Paahlot
Posts: 4,091
Default

How about we split Captain and FO pay now that’s FAIR.
TiredSoul is offline  
Old 12-31-2021, 07:01 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,352
Default

I would have preferred an overhaul of open-time and trip trading to get trips into the system rather than create arbitrary caps. Those caps can and are bypassed by listing trips as ASAP trips or not putting those trips into open-time at all. It would have been nice to focus on making systems work as planned rather than implementing caps, etc. Oh well.
Elevation is offline  
Old 12-31-2021, 07:32 PM
  #78  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: Whale FO
Posts: 6,474
Default

Originally Posted by Elevation View Post
I would have preferred an overhaul of open-time and trip trading to get trips into the system rather than create arbitrary caps. Those caps can and are bypassed by listing trips as ASAP trips or not putting those trips into open-time at all. It would have been nice to focus on making systems work as planned rather than implementing caps, etc. Oh well.
You know that's all in the CBA, right? Programming AIMS just takes time. Read the yellow bits in Article 25.
dera is offline  
Old 12-31-2021, 11:03 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,352
Default

Originally Posted by dera View Post
You know that's all in the CBA, right? Programming AIMS just takes time. Read the yellow bits in Article 25.
I did see that we have improvements in Article 25 coming, specifically with short notice open-time. True we see some language that limits abuse of the ASAP open-time trips. However I didn't see anything that forces the company to put trips into the open-time system. Perhaps I missed it?

We were talking about this in context of the VX cap. As long as there are ways for trips to make it to volunteering pilots without them hitting the open time system, the hour-cap will encourage more sideline deals. While the intent was to make things more fair, the effect may be to drive more trips toward specific pets and favorites. People playing by the rules will be the ones to suffer here. Hopefully I'm wrong, and I simply missed something in our draft. Personally I think we have more important stuff to work towards.
Elevation is offline  
Old 01-01-2022, 12:16 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
C17B74's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Posts: 1,505
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul View Post
How about we split Captain and FO pay now that’s FAIR.
Hush TS, what kind of madness is this. Being a senior FO sniping art 33 bid lines has been very good for some of us. By no means art 33 Capt pay, but I don’t sit in the Hot seat continuously and wouldn’t be able hold these trips as much if any being in the left. I have also been racking up that ever so lucrative PIC relief snoozer time. This “displaced Clams” deal hasn’t been hurtful either.
C17B74 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldmako
United
103
10-25-2019 12:02 PM
Cruise
Spirit
10507
12-01-2016 12:52 PM
shoelu
Major
30
02-05-2015 10:30 AM
Deez340
Regional
160
05-06-2008 09:41 PM
captain_drew
Cargo
3
06-01-2005 12:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices