Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo > Atlas/Polar
NMB Sets Representation Election for Atlas, Polar Flight Crewmembers >

NMB Sets Representation Election for Atlas, Polar Flight Crewmembers

Search

Notices

NMB Sets Representation Election for Atlas, Polar Flight Crewmembers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2008 | 02:22 PM
  #1  
Splanky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Moving backwards
Default NMB Sets Representation Election for Atlas, Polar Flight Crewmembers

NMB Sets Representation Election for Atlas, Polar Flight Crewmembers

I am not familiar with the rules around this. Is the teamsters allowed to push for a vote on the issue? Or does representation from the pilot group need to get the ball rolling?
Reply
Old 10-26-2008 | 12:17 AM
  #2  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

This kind of a vote only happens if the 'new' union submits cards signed by at least 60% of the pilots who want a 'new' union.
Reply
Old 10-27-2008 | 09:46 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Lars
This kind of a vote only happens if the 'new' union submits cards signed by at least 60% of the pilots who want a 'new' union.
93% of Atlas pilots submitted cards.
Reply
Old 10-28-2008 | 10:44 PM
  #4  
Sniper's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Default

US Airways and AmericaWest v. 2.0. Nothing like voting in a new union to get the ball rolling on a smooth integration of two pilot groups.

I know the issues, but is this really the best solution? Let's hope so, for all the Atlas/Polar guys, as well as pilots in general.
Reply
Old 10-30-2008 | 06:53 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper
US Airways and AmericaWest v. 2.0. Nothing like voting in a new union to get the ball rolling on a smooth integration of two pilot groups.

I know the issues, but is this really the best solution? Let's hope so, for all the Atlas/Polar guys, as well as pilots in general.
The “integration of two pilot groups” is exactly the issue. ALPA National has done nothing but delay the merger and enable (or worse) the squabbling between the two MECs.

It is significant that the Teamsters first act has been a single carrier petition, and that the NMB wasted little time in deciding in favor. ALPA should have done this in 2001. Think about that – for 7 years ALPA National has let this thing fester.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
cptmorgancrunch
Regional
5
10-21-2008 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices